Re: RISC-V Patchwork

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:15:04AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 16:29:35 PDT (-0700), Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 04:14:39PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:07:45 PDT (-0700), Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > Hey,
> > > >
> > > > As one or two people have already noticed, we've resurrected the
> > > > patchwork for the RISC-V list @
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/
> > > >
> > > > The patchwork bot should let people know when their patches have been
> > > > applied. Hopefully it'll help people track what the status of their
> > > > patches are a little better and try to prevent stuff falling through
> > > > the cracks in Palmer's inbox.
> > > >
> > > > As an FYI, the statuses that are intended to be used are:
> > > > - New: No action has been taken yet
> > > > - Under Review: The maintainer is waiting for review comments from others
> > > > - Changes Requested: Either the maintainer or a reviewer requested
> > > >   changes in the patch. The patch author is expected to submit a new
> > > >   version
> > > > - Superseded: There's a new version of the patch available
> > > > - Not Applicable: The patch is not intended for the RISC-V tree
> > > > - Accepted: The patch has been applied
> > > > - Rejected: The patch has been rejected, with reasons stated in an
> > > >   email
> > > >
> > > > I reset patchwork and marked all patches as archived so we would have a
> > > > fresh start. If your patch has been archived & not applied by the end of
> > > > this merge window, feel free to resend it.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Conor.
> > > >
> > > > @Palmer: hopefully I did the scissors thing correctly..
> > > 
> > > b4 doesn't like it, but my old scripts just picked up the whole thing as a
> > > patch.  I tossed the above bits, LMK if something went off the rails.
> > 
> > I just copied the suggested scissors format from the git-mailinfo man
> > page and pasted that. I didn't know this prior to 5 mins ago, but
> > `b4 mbox` splits it on the scissors line, into a patch and an email
> > inside the mbox - but for w/e reason, `git am` (or `b4 shazam`) then
> > seems to try and apply the email instead of the patch? Or else pasting
> > the patch into mutt was a terrible idea? Maybe it's worth mentioning to
> > Konstantin that things get messed up here, I'll do it tomorrow if I
> > remember.
> 
> If the man pages suggest doing this but the tools fail then it's worth
> fixing something, even if it's just the man page ;)

Konstantin, perhaps you can shed some light on what's happening here?
FWIW I see this on 0.10.0-dev-d8d41.

Thanks,
Conor.

> 
> > Unlikely I'll ever really send many more patches with this format so w/e
> > at the end of the day.
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > -- >8 --
> > > > From f886e8a9def4bd3f2fa8a0a4d7e92c94fe72ea72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > > > Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:49:53 +0100
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add RISC-V's patchwork
> > > >
> > > > The RISC-V patchwork instance on kernel.org has had some necromancy
> > > > performed on it & will be used going forward. The statuses that are
> > > > intended to be used are:
> > > > - New: No action has been taken yet
> > > > - Under Review: The maintainer is waiting for review comments from others
> > > > - Changes Requested: Either the maintainer or a reviewer requested
> > > >   changes in the patch. The patch author is expected to submit a new
> > > >   version
> > > > - Superseded: There's a new version of the patch available
> > > > - Not Applicable: The patch is not intended for the RISC-V tree
> > > > - Accepted: The patch has been applied
> > > > - Rejected: The patch has been rejected, with reasons stated in an
> > > >   email
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > index 8a5012ba6ff9..e2882dc703d8 100644
> > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > @@ -17516,6 +17516,7 @@ M:	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> > > >  M:	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
> > > >  L:	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > > >  S:	Supported
> > > > +Q:	https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/
> > > >  P:	Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst
> > > >  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git
> > > >  F:	arch/riscv/
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-riscv mailing list
> > > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> > > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv