From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: RISC-V Patchwork
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:29:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0ifX4gYDD0DIkYd@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mhng-8133a216-9206-49bc-bff5-0cbedfb2ce28@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 04:14:39PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:07:45 PDT (-0700), Conor Dooley wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > As one or two people have already noticed, we've resurrected the
> > patchwork for the RISC-V list @
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/
> >
> > The patchwork bot should let people know when their patches have been
> > applied. Hopefully it'll help people track what the status of their
> > patches are a little better and try to prevent stuff falling through
> > the cracks in Palmer's inbox.
> >
> > As an FYI, the statuses that are intended to be used are:
> > - New: No action has been taken yet
> > - Under Review: The maintainer is waiting for review comments from others
> > - Changes Requested: Either the maintainer or a reviewer requested
> > changes in the patch. The patch author is expected to submit a new
> > version
> > - Superseded: There's a new version of the patch available
> > - Not Applicable: The patch is not intended for the RISC-V tree
> > - Accepted: The patch has been applied
> > - Rejected: The patch has been rejected, with reasons stated in an
> > email
> >
> > I reset patchwork and marked all patches as archived so we would have a
> > fresh start. If your patch has been archived & not applied by the end of
> > this merge window, feel free to resend it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> >
> > @Palmer: hopefully I did the scissors thing correctly..
>
> b4 doesn't like it, but my old scripts just picked up the whole thing as a
> patch. I tossed the above bits, LMK if something went off the rails.
I just copied the suggested scissors format from the git-mailinfo man
page and pasted that. I didn't know this prior to 5 mins ago, but
`b4 mbox` splits it on the scissors line, into a patch and an email
inside the mbox - but for w/e reason, `git am` (or `b4 shazam`) then
seems to try and apply the email instead of the patch? Or else pasting
the patch into mutt was a terrible idea? Maybe it's worth mentioning to
Konstantin that things get messed up here, I'll do it tomorrow if I
remember.
Unlikely I'll ever really send many more patches with this format so w/e
at the end of the day.
Thanks,
Conor.
>
> >
> > -- >8 --
> > From f886e8a9def4bd3f2fa8a0a4d7e92c94fe72ea72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:49:53 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add RISC-V's patchwork
> >
> > The RISC-V patchwork instance on kernel.org has had some necromancy
> > performed on it & will be used going forward. The statuses that are
> > intended to be used are:
> > - New: No action has been taken yet
> > - Under Review: The maintainer is waiting for review comments from others
> > - Changes Requested: Either the maintainer or a reviewer requested
> > changes in the patch. The patch author is expected to submit a new
> > version
> > - Superseded: There's a new version of the patch available
> > - Not Applicable: The patch is not intended for the RISC-V tree
> > - Accepted: The patch has been applied
> > - Rejected: The patch has been rejected, with reasons stated in an
> > email
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 8a5012ba6ff9..e2882dc703d8 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -17516,6 +17516,7 @@ M: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> > M: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
> > L: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > S: Supported
> > +Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/
> > P: Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst
> > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git
> > F: arch/riscv/
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-13 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-11 16:07 RISC-V Patchwork Conor Dooley
2022-10-13 23:14 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-13 23:29 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-10-14 16:15 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-14 18:18 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-10 21:40 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2022-10-26 16:52 ` Conor Dooley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-20 16:14 Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-20 16:14 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-20 18:23 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-20 18:23 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-21 18:02 ` Nick Kossifidis
2018-11-21 18:02 ` Nick Kossifidis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y0ifX4gYDD0DIkYd@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox