Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: RISC-V: Fix a typo in patch-acceptance

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 07:01:37AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> I just stumbled on this when modifying the docs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst
> index dfe0ac5624fb..5da6f9b273d6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ their own custom extensions.  These custom extensions aren't required
>  to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V
>  Foundation.  To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential
>  performance impact of adding kernel code for implementor-specific

s/implementor/implementer no? Or is this an American spelling?

> -RISC-V extensions, we'll only to accept patches for extensions that
> +RISC-V extensions, we'll only accept patches for extensions that
>  have been officially frozen or ratified by the RISC-V Foundation.
>  (Implementors, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees
>  containing code for any custom extensions that they wish.)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv