From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, andy.yan@rock-chips.com,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: dsi: convert to dev_err_probe in probe function
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:46:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ebf024568d041e2f7b8f6af46dad295@manjaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241108144425.1009916-1-heiko@sntech.de>
Hello Heiko,
Thanks for the patch. Please, see a couple of comments below.
On 2024-11-08 15:44, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
>
> DRM_DEV_ERROR is deprecated and using dev_err_probe saves quite a
> number
> of lines too, so convert the error prints for the dsi-driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c | 80 ++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> index 58a44af0e9ad..3224ab749352 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> @@ -1356,17 +1356,15 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *res;
> const struct rockchip_dw_dsi_chip_data *cdata =
> of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> - int ret, i;
> + int i;
>
> dsi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dsi), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!dsi)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> dsi->base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, &res);
> - if (IS_ERR(dsi->base)) {
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Unable to get dsi registers\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(dsi->base);
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->base))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->base), "Unable to get dsi
> registers\n");
>
> i = 0;
> while (cdata[i].reg) {
> @@ -1378,67 +1376,47 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> i++;
> }
>
> - if (!dsi->cdata) {
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "no dsi-config for %s node\n", np->name);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + if (!dsi->cdata)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "No dsi-config for %s node\n",
> np->name);
>
> /* try to get a possible external dphy */
> dsi->phy = devm_phy_optional_get(dev, "dphy");
> - if (IS_ERR(dsi->phy)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->phy);
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to get mipi dphy: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->phy))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->phy), "Failed to get mipi
> dphy\n");
After spending a couple of days thinking about it, I think this
particular change should be extracted into a separate patch and
submitted additionally for the inclusion into stable kernels.
My reasoning behind that is the "spamming" of the kernel log with
multiple suspiciously looking error messages when getting the dphy
results in deferred probing, which IMHO looks really bad and may
cause false impression of underlying issues.
If you agree with this suggestion, please feel free to use the
relevant parts of the description of the patch I submitted and
withdrawn earlier, [*] to provide the required rationale for the
inclusion into stable kernels.
[*]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/559094275c3e41cae7c89e904341f89a1240a51a.1731073565.git.dsimic@manjaro.org/
> dsi->pclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pclk");
> - if (IS_ERR(dsi->pclk)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->pclk);
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Unable to get pclk: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->pclk))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->pclk), "Unable to get
> pclk\n");
>
> dsi->pllref_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ref");
> if (IS_ERR(dsi->pllref_clk)) {
> - if (dsi->phy) {
> + if (dsi->phy)
> /*
> * if external phy is present, pll will be
> * generated there.
> */
> dsi->pllref_clk = NULL;
> - } else {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->pllref_clk);
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev,
> - "Unable to get pll reference clock: %d\n",
> - ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + else
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->pllref_clk),
> + "Unable to get pll reference clock\n");
> }
>
> if (dsi->cdata->flags & DW_MIPI_NEEDS_PHY_CFG_CLK) {
> dsi->phy_cfg_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "phy_cfg");
> - if (IS_ERR(dsi->phy_cfg_clk)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->phy_cfg_clk);
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev,
> - "Unable to get phy_cfg_clk: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->phy_cfg_clk))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->phy_cfg_clk),
> + "Unable to get phy_cfg_clk\n");
> }
>
> if (dsi->cdata->flags & DW_MIPI_NEEDS_GRF_CLK) {
> dsi->grf_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "grf");
> - if (IS_ERR(dsi->grf_clk)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->grf_clk);
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Unable to get grf_clk: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->grf_clk))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->grf_clk), "Unable to get
> grf_clk\n");
> }
>
> dsi->grf_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np,
> "rockchip,grf");
> - if (IS_ERR(dsi->grf_regmap)) {
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Unable to get rockchip,grf\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(dsi->grf_regmap);
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->grf_regmap))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->grf_regmap), "Unable to get
> rockchip,grf\n");
>
> dsi->dev = dev;
> dsi->pdata.base = dsi->base;
> @@ -1451,24 +1429,18 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> mutex_init(&dsi->usage_mutex);
>
> dsi->dphy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_ops);
> - if (IS_ERR(dsi->dphy)) {
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(&pdev->dev, "failed to create PHY\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(dsi->dphy);
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->dphy))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->dphy), "Failed to create
> PHY\n");
>
> phy_set_drvdata(dsi->dphy, dsi);
> phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev,
> of_phy_simple_xlate);
> if (IS_ERR(phy_provider))
> - return PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(phy_provider),
> + "Failed to register phy-provider\n");
>
> dsi->dmd = dw_mipi_dsi_probe(pdev, &dsi->pdata);
> - if (IS_ERR(dsi->dmd)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->dmd);
> - if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> - DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev,
> - "Failed to probe dw_mipi_dsi: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (IS_ERR(dsi->dmd))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->dmd), "Failed to probe
> dw_mipi_dsi\n");
>
> return 0;
> }
Regardless of the above-suggested split into a patch series
ending up accepted or not, the introduced changes are looking
good to me, so please feel free to include my
Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-10 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 14:44 [PATCH] drm/rockchip: dsi: convert to dev_err_probe in probe function Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-08 15:21 ` Diederik de Haas
2024-11-08 16:31 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-11-08 16:37 ` Diederik de Haas
2024-11-10 4:46 ` Dragan Simic [this message]
2024-11-10 11:51 ` Diederik de Haas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ebf024568d041e2f7b8f6af46dad295@manjaro.org \
--to=dsimic@manjaro.org \
--cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=heiko.stuebner@cherry.de \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox