Linux-Rockchip Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Diederik de Haas" <didi.debian@cknow.org>
To: "Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <dsimic@manjaro.org>, <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
	<maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, <mripard@kernel.org>,
	<tzimmermann@suse.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: dsi: convert to dev_err_probe in probe function
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 16:21:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D5GWE4WJZMM8.1MPHPPQR2QW46@cknow.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241108144425.1009916-1-heiko@sntech.de>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3752 bytes --]

On Fri Nov 8, 2024 at 3:44 PM CET, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
>
> DRM_DEV_ERROR is deprecated and using dev_err_probe saves quite a number
> of lines too, so convert the error prints for the dsi-driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>

Should this have a Fixes tag?
Because in the PineTab2 case it reported an error, which was actually
just a deferred probe.

> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c   | 80 ++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> index 58a44af0e9ad..3224ab749352 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> ...
> @@ -1378,67 +1376,47 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		i++;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!dsi->cdata) {
> -		DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "no dsi-config for %s node\n", np->name);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	if (!dsi->cdata)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "No dsi-config for %s node\n", np->name);
>  
>  	/* try to get a possible external dphy */
>  	dsi->phy = devm_phy_optional_get(dev, "dphy");
> -	if (IS_ERR(dsi->phy)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->phy);
> -		DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to get mipi dphy: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> +	if (IS_ERR(dsi->phy))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->phy), "Failed to get mipi dphy\n");

I think from this line.

Cheers,
  Diederik

>  
>  	dsi->pclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pclk");
> -	if (IS_ERR(dsi->pclk)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->pclk);
> -		DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Unable to get pclk: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> +	if (IS_ERR(dsi->pclk))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->pclk), "Unable to get pclk\n");
>  
>  	dsi->pllref_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ref");
>  	if (IS_ERR(dsi->pllref_clk)) {
> -		if (dsi->phy) {
> +		if (dsi->phy)
>  			/*
>  			 * if external phy is present, pll will be
>  			 * generated there.
>  			 */
>  			dsi->pllref_clk = NULL;
> -		} else {
> -			ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->pllref_clk);
> -			DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev,
> -				      "Unable to get pll reference clock: %d\n",
> -				      ret);
> -			return ret;
> -		}
> +		else
> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->pllref_clk),
> +					     "Unable to get pll reference clock\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	if (dsi->cdata->flags & DW_MIPI_NEEDS_PHY_CFG_CLK) {
>  		dsi->phy_cfg_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "phy_cfg");
> -		if (IS_ERR(dsi->phy_cfg_clk)) {
> -			ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->phy_cfg_clk);
> -			DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev,
> -				      "Unable to get phy_cfg_clk: %d\n", ret);
> -			return ret;
> -		}
> +		if (IS_ERR(dsi->phy_cfg_clk))
> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->phy_cfg_clk),
> +					     "Unable to get phy_cfg_clk\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	if (dsi->cdata->flags & DW_MIPI_NEEDS_GRF_CLK) {
>  		dsi->grf_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "grf");
> -		if (IS_ERR(dsi->grf_clk)) {
> -			ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->grf_clk);
> -			DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Unable to get grf_clk: %d\n", ret);
> -			return ret;
> -		}
> +		if (IS_ERR(dsi->grf_clk))
> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->grf_clk), "Unable to get grf_clk\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	dsi->grf_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "rockchip,grf");
> -	if (IS_ERR(dsi->grf_regmap)) {
> -		DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Unable to get rockchip,grf\n");
> -		return PTR_ERR(dsi->grf_regmap);
> -	}
> +	if (IS_ERR(dsi->grf_regmap))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dsi->grf_regmap), "Unable to get rockchip,grf\n");
>  
>  	dsi->dev = dev;
>  	dsi->pdata.base = dsi->base;
> ...


[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-08 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-08 14:44 [PATCH] drm/rockchip: dsi: convert to dev_err_probe in probe function Heiko Stuebner
2024-11-08 15:21 ` Diederik de Haas [this message]
2024-11-08 16:31   ` Heiko Stübner
2024-11-08 16:37     ` Diederik de Haas
2024-11-10  4:46 ` Dragan Simic
2024-11-10 11:51 ` Diederik de Haas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D5GWE4WJZMM8.1MPHPPQR2QW46@cknow.org \
    --to=didi.debian@cknow.org \
    --cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dsimic@manjaro.org \
    --cc=heiko.stuebner@cherry.de \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox