* [PATCH] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: detect Sink PSR state after configuring the PSR
@ 2016-08-26 10:19 Yakir Yang
2016-09-06 19:51 ` Sean Paul
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yakir Yang @ 2016-08-26 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Paul, daniel.vetter, Inki Dae
Cc: Stéphane Marchesin, Tomasz Figa, dianders, Thierry Reding,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Heiko Stuebner, Jingoo Han, David Airlie,
Javier Martinez Canillas, Yakir Yang, linux-kernel, dri-devel,
linux-samsung-soc, linux-rockchip
Make sure the request PSR state could effect in analogix_dp_send_psr_spd()
function, or printing the error Sink PSR state if we failed to effect
the request PSR setting.
Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 6 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
index efac8ab..5a37de8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
@@ -115,8 +115,7 @@ int analogix_dp_enable_psr(struct device *dev)
psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
psr_vsc.DB1 = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE | EDP_VSC_PSR_CRC_VALUES_VALID;
- analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
- return 0;
+ return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_enable_psr);
@@ -138,8 +137,7 @@ int analogix_dp_disable_psr(struct device *dev)
psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
psr_vsc.DB1 = 0;
- analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
- return 0;
+ return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_disable_psr);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
index 473b980..f617a9d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ void analogix_dp_config_video_slave_mode(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
void analogix_dp_enable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
void analogix_dp_disable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
-void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
- struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);
+int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
+ struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);
#endif /* _ANALOGIX_DP_CORE_H */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
index 52c1b6b..505e9d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
@@ -1328,9 +1328,11 @@ void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
writel(PSR_VID_CRC_ENABLE, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_CRC_CON);
}
-void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
- struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
+int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
+ struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
{
+ unsigned long timeout;
+ unsigned char sink;
unsigned int val;
/* don't send info frame */
@@ -1372,4 +1374,24 @@ void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
val = readl(dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
val |= IF_EN;
writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
+
+ timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
+ while (1) {
+ analogix_dp_read_byte_from_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_STATUS, &sink);
+
+ if (vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB)
+ break;
+
+ if (!vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_INACTIVE)
+ break;
+
+ if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
+ dev_warn(dp->dev, "Failed to effect PSR: %x", sink);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ usleep_range(1000, 1500);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: detect Sink PSR state after configuring the PSR
2016-08-26 10:19 [PATCH] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: detect Sink PSR state after configuring the PSR Yakir Yang
@ 2016-09-06 19:51 ` Sean Paul
2016-09-07 3:50 ` Yakir Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sean Paul @ 2016-09-06 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yakir Yang
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-samsung-soc, linux-rockchip,
Daniel Vetter, Douglas Anderson, dri-devel, Tomasz Figa,
Javier Martinez Canillas, Jingoo Han, Stéphane Marchesin,
Thierry Reding, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> Make sure the request PSR state could effect in analogix_dp_send_psr_spd()
> function, or printing the error Sink PSR state if we failed to effect
> the request PSR setting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> index efac8ab..5a37de8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> @@ -115,8 +115,7 @@ int analogix_dp_enable_psr(struct device *dev)
> psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
> psr_vsc.DB1 = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE | EDP_VSC_PSR_CRC_VALUES_VALID;
>
> - analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
> - return 0;
> + return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_enable_psr);
>
> @@ -138,8 +137,7 @@ int analogix_dp_disable_psr(struct device *dev)
> psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
> psr_vsc.DB1 = 0;
>
> - analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
> - return 0;
> + return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_disable_psr);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
> index 473b980..f617a9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ void analogix_dp_config_video_slave_mode(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
> void analogix_dp_enable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
> void analogix_dp_disable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
> void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
> -void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> - struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);
> +int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> + struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);
>
> #endif /* _ANALOGIX_DP_CORE_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> index 52c1b6b..505e9d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> @@ -1328,9 +1328,11 @@ void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
> writel(PSR_VID_CRC_ENABLE, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_CRC_CON);
> }
>
> -void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> - struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
> +int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> + struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
> {
> + unsigned long timeout;
> + unsigned char sink;
u8
> unsigned int val;
>
> /* don't send info frame */
> @@ -1372,4 +1374,24 @@ void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> val = readl(dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
> val |= IF_EN;
> writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
> +
> + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
Pull 100 out into a #define
> + while (1) {
> + analogix_dp_read_byte_from_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_STATUS, &sink);
You should be checking return value here.
> +
> + if (vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB)
> + break;
> +
> + if (!vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_INACTIVE)
> + break;
> +
> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
> + dev_warn(dp->dev, "Failed to effect PSR: %x", sink);
> + return -EBUSY;
-ETIMEDOUT is more appropriate
> + }
> +
> + usleep_range(1000, 1500);
> + }
The while(1) loop is a little scary. I'd rather do:
while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
ret = analogix_dp_read_byte_from_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_STATUS, &sink);
if (ret != 1) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(dp->dev, "PSR_STATUS read failed
ret=%d", ret);
return ret;
}
if (vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB ||
!vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_INACTIVE)
return 0;
usleep_range(1000, 1500);
}
dev_warn(dp->dev, "Failed to effect PSR: %x", sink);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: detect Sink PSR state after configuring the PSR
2016-09-06 19:51 ` Sean Paul
@ 2016-09-07 3:50 ` Yakir Yang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yakir Yang @ 2016-09-07 3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Paul
Cc: Daniel Vetter, Inki Dae, Stéphane Marchesin, Tomasz Figa,
Douglas Anderson, Thierry Reding, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Heiko Stuebner, Jingoo Han, David Airlie,
Javier Martinez Canillas, Linux Kernel Mailing List, dri-devel,
linux-samsung-soc, linux-rockchip
Sean,
Thanks for your comments.
On 09/07/2016 03:51 AM, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> Make sure the request PSR state could effect in analogix_dp_send_psr_spd()
>> function, or printing the error Sink PSR state if we failed to effect
>> the request PSR setting.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 6 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>> index efac8ab..5a37de8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>> @@ -115,8 +115,7 @@ int analogix_dp_enable_psr(struct device *dev)
>> psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
>> psr_vsc.DB1 = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE | EDP_VSC_PSR_CRC_VALUES_VALID;
>>
>> - analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
>> - return 0;
>> + return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_enable_psr);
>>
>> @@ -138,8 +137,7 @@ int analogix_dp_disable_psr(struct device *dev)
>> psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
>> psr_vsc.DB1 = 0;
>>
>> - analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
>> - return 0;
>> + return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_disable_psr);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
>> index 473b980..f617a9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
>> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ void analogix_dp_config_video_slave_mode(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>> void analogix_dp_enable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>> void analogix_dp_disable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>> void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>> -void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>> - struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);
>> +int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>> + struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);
>>
>> #endif /* _ANALOGIX_DP_CORE_H */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
>> index 52c1b6b..505e9d8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
>> @@ -1328,9 +1328,11 @@ void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
>> writel(PSR_VID_CRC_ENABLE, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_CRC_CON);
>> }
>>
>> -void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>> - struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
>> +int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>> + struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
>> {
>> + unsigned long timeout;
>> + unsigned char sink;
> u8
Done
>> unsigned int val;
>>
>> /* don't send info frame */
>> @@ -1372,4 +1374,24 @@ void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>> val = readl(dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
>> val |= IF_EN;
>> writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
>> +
>> + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
> Pull 100 out into a #define
Done
>> + while (1) {
>> + analogix_dp_read_byte_from_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_STATUS, &sink);
> You should be checking return value here.
Done
>> +
>> + if (vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + if (!vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_INACTIVE)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
>> + dev_warn(dp->dev, "Failed to effect PSR: %x", sink);
>> + return -EBUSY;
> -ETIMEDOUT is more appropriate
Done
>> + }
>> +
>> + usleep_range(1000, 1500);
>> + }
> The while(1) loop is a little scary. I'd rather do:
>
> while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> ret = analogix_dp_read_byte_from_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_STATUS, &sink);
> if (ret != 1) {
> DRM_DEV_ERROR(dp->dev, "PSR_STATUS read failed
> ret=%d", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> if (vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB ||
> !vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_INACTIVE)
> return 0;
>
> usleep_range(1000, 1500);
> }
>
> dev_warn(dp->dev, "Failed to effect PSR: %x", sink);
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
Thanks for your code.
- Yakir
>
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-07 3:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-26 10:19 [PATCH] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: detect Sink PSR state after configuring the PSR Yakir Yang
2016-09-06 19:51 ` Sean Paul
2016-09-07 3:50 ` Yakir Yang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox