Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: give some life to the rk3328-roc-cc leds

[Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>]

Am Samstag, 2. März 2019, 03:51:07 CET schrieb Leonidas P. Papadakos:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 01:31:11AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 1. März 2019, 23:58:13 CET schrieb Leonidas P. Papadakos:
> > > Assign the LED's to heartbeat and sdcard io, as in other RK boards.
> > > 
> > > https://github.com/armbian/build/commit/f1affad5c7be62d6e93832af3556c7609edd0858
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Leonidas P. Papadakos <papadakospan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > >  .../arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-roc-cc.dts | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-roc-cc.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-roc-cc.dts
> > > index 33c44e857..a881d4c8d 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-roc-cc.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328-roc-cc.dts
> > > @@ -81,6 +81,33 @@
> > >  		regulator-always-on;
> > >  		regulator-boot-on;
> > >  	};
> > > +
> > > +	leds {
> > > +		compatible = "gpio-leds";
> > > +		power {
> > > +			label = "firefly:blue:power";
> > > +			linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
> > > +			gpios = <&rk805 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > > +			default-state = "on";
> > > +			mode = <0x23>;
> > > +		};
> > > +
> > > +		user {
> > > +			label = "firefly:yellow:user";
> > > +			linux,default-trigger = "mmc1";
> > > +			gpios = <&rk805 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > > +			default-state = "off";
> > > +			mode = <0x05>;
> > > +		};
> > > +
> > > +		ir {
> > > +			status = "disabled";
> > 
> > please explain that. Is this an IR transmitting LED? And why are you
> > adding a disabled property?
> > 
> > Similar to how the kernel should not contain commented out code
> > having a disabled node in the actual board file is strange.
> > 
> > 
> > Heiko
> > 
> 
> It probably is. See the image of the board on this site:
> https://shop.t-firefly.com/goods.php?id=65
> 
> Should I make a PATCH v2 without it?

yes, that would be nice, as we don't want to add dead nodes
to actual board devicetrees.