public inbox for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
	Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Add a lockdep assertion for remaining dev->iommu_group reads
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 14:50:25 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2-v2-b0417f84403e+11f-iommu_group_locking_jgg@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0-v2-b0417f84403e+11f-iommu_group_locking_jgg@nvidia.com>

The remaining reads are all in functions called under ops->device_group.

Broadly these functions are walking around the device tree (eg going up
the PCI bus tree) and are trying to de-duplicate group allocations
according to their logic.

Since these functions don't hold any particular per-device locks their
reads to dev->iommu_group are being locked by the caller's
iommu_probe_device_lock, and this explains why iommu_probe_device_lock
needs to be a global lock.

Rename iommu_probe_device_lock to dev_iommu_group_lock, make it local to
the module and annotate all the device_group helpers with
iommu_group_get_locked() that includes a lockdep to indicate that they are
special.

Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 409090eaac543a..f1c8a333553e3b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ static unsigned int iommu_def_domain_type __read_mostly;
 static bool iommu_dma_strict __read_mostly = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_STRICT);
 static u32 iommu_cmd_line __read_mostly;
 
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(dev_iommu_group_lock);
+
 struct iommu_group {
 	struct kobject kobj;
 	struct kobject *devices_kobj;
@@ -438,7 +440,6 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
 {
 	const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev->bus->iommu_ops;
 	struct iommu_group *group;
-	static DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_probe_device_lock);
 	struct group_device *gdev;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -451,7 +452,7 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
 	 * probably be able to use device_lock() here to minimise the scope,
 	 * but for now enforcing a simple global ordering is fine.
 	 */
-	mutex_lock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&dev_iommu_group_lock);
 
 	/* Device is probed already if in a group */
 	if (dev->iommu_group) {
@@ -497,7 +498,7 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
 			list_add_tail(&group->entry, group_list);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
-	mutex_unlock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&dev_iommu_group_lock);
 
 	if (dev_is_pci(dev))
 		iommu_dma_set_pci_32bit_workaround(dev);
@@ -512,7 +513,7 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
 	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
 	iommu_group_put(group);
 out_unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&dev_iommu_group_lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1219,6 +1220,12 @@ struct iommu_group *iommu_group_get(struct device *dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_group_get);
 
+static struct iommu_group *iommu_group_get_locked(struct device *dev)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&dev_iommu_group_lock);
+	return iommu_group_get(dev);
+}
+
 /**
  * iommu_group_ref_get - Increment reference on a group
  * @group: the group to use, must not be NULL
@@ -1532,7 +1539,7 @@ static struct iommu_group *get_pci_alias_group(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	if (test_and_set_bit(pdev->devfn & 0xff, devfns))
 		return NULL;
 
-	group = iommu_group_get(&pdev->dev);
+	group = iommu_group_get_locked(&pdev->dev);
 	if (group)
 		return group;
 
@@ -1573,7 +1580,7 @@ static int get_pci_alias_or_group(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *opaque)
 	struct group_for_pci_data *data = opaque;
 
 	data->pdev = pdev;
-	data->group = iommu_group_get(&pdev->dev);
+	data->group = iommu_group_get_locked(&pdev->dev);
 
 	return data->group != NULL;
 }
@@ -1629,7 +1636,7 @@ struct iommu_group *pci_device_group(struct device *dev)
 
 		pdev = bus->self;
 
-		group = iommu_group_get(&pdev->dev);
+		group = iommu_group_get_locked(&pdev->dev);
 		if (group)
 			return group;
 	}
@@ -1662,7 +1669,7 @@ struct iommu_group *fsl_mc_device_group(struct device *dev)
 	struct device *cont_dev = fsl_mc_cont_dev(dev);
 	struct iommu_group *group;
 
-	group = iommu_group_get(cont_dev);
+	group = iommu_group_get_locked(cont_dev);
 	if (!group)
 		group = iommu_group_alloc();
 	return group;
-- 
2.41.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-31 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-31 17:50 [PATCH v2 00/10] Refine the locking for dev->iommu_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] iommu: Remove useless group refcounting Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-02  1:33   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-07-31 17:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-08-02  1:34   ` [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Add a lockdep assertion for remaining dev->iommu_group reads Tian, Kevin
2023-08-08 16:22   ` Robin Murphy
2023-08-08 16:54     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] iommu: Add generic_single_device_group() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-02  1:35   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/sun50i: Convert to generic_single_device_group() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu/sprd: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/rockchip: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-09 13:19   ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-08-09 13:51     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-09 14:02       ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] iommu/omap: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] iommu: Complete the locking for dev->iommu_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-02  1:36   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-08-09 12:55   ` [PATCH v2 9/10] " Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] iommu/intel: Fix missing locking for show_device_domain_translation() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-02  1:37   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-08-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Refine the locking for dev->iommu_group Joerg Roedel
2023-08-08 10:31   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-08-08 12:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-08 12:32     ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-08-08 13:00       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-08 13:08         ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-08-08 13:25           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-08 14:02             ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-08-08 14:30               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-08 14:51                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-08-09  6:23                 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-08-08 13:00       ` Marek Szyprowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2-v2-b0417f84403e+11f-iommu_group_locking_jgg@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox