From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Refine the locking for dev->iommu_group
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 16:02:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc5d6aa8-e8ca-c896-2f39-af074d55e436@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZNJCRhGGxS+63Dnr@nvidia.com>
Hi Jason,
On 08.08.2023 15:25, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 03:08:30PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> Any of the drivers that use platform device as the iommu_device will
>>> have a problem, please try:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/ZNIz%2FNVLb6WqqvQx@nvidia.com/
>> I've checked and it doesn't help in my case. I will soon check why.
> Oh, I botched it. Forgot that the iommu_device->dev is the sysfs
> handle not the HW device. Maybe this:
This fixed the early lockup, but then system hangs again a bit later. It
looks that this device lock in __iommu_probe_device() is really
problematic, because __iommu_probe_device() is then called during the
iommu 'client device' probe on the probed device. Here is a complete
call stack:
unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x70
dump_stack_lvl from __iommu_probe_device+0x3d8/0x4b8
__iommu_probe_device from iommu_probe_device+0x10/0x40
iommu_probe_device from of_iommu_configure+0xf8/0x1c8
of_iommu_configure from of_dma_configure_id+0x188/0x450
of_dma_configure_id from platform_dma_configure+0x24/0x60
platform_dma_configure from really_probe+0xac/0x3d4
really_probe from __driver_probe_device+0xa0/0x1e8
__driver_probe_device from driver_probe_device+0x30/0xd0
driver_probe_device from __driver_attach+0x10c/0x190
__driver_attach from bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0xb4
bus_for_each_dev from bus_add_driver+0xe0/0x208
bus_add_driver from driver_register+0x7c/0x118
driver_register from exynos_drm_init+0xe0/0x14c
exynos_drm_init from do_one_initcall+0x6c/0x318
do_one_initcall from kernel_init_freeable+0x1c4/0x214
kernel_init_freeable from kernel_init+0x18/0x12c
kernel_init from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c
Any ideas?
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-31 17:50 [PATCH v2 00/10] Refine the locking for dev->iommu_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] iommu: Remove useless group refcounting Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-02 1:33 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Add a lockdep assertion for remaining dev->iommu_group reads Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-02 1:34 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-08-08 16:22 ` Robin Murphy
2023-08-08 16:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] iommu: Add generic_single_device_group() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-02 1:35 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/sun50i: Convert to generic_single_device_group() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu/sprd: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/rockchip: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-09 13:19 ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-08-09 13:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-09 14:02 ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] iommu/omap: " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] iommu: Complete the locking for dev->iommu_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-02 1:36 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-08-09 12:55 ` [PATCH v2 9/10] " Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] iommu/intel: Fix missing locking for show_device_domain_translation() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-02 1:37 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-08-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Refine the locking for dev->iommu_group Joerg Roedel
2023-08-08 10:31 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-08-08 12:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-08 12:32 ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-08-08 13:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-08 13:08 ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-08-08 13:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-08 14:02 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2023-08-08 14:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-08 14:51 ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-08-09 6:23 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-08-08 13:00 ` Marek Szyprowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc5d6aa8-e8ca-c896-2f39-af074d55e436@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox