public inbox for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Bryan Wu" <cooloney@gmail.com>,
	"Richard Purdie" <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
	"Jacek Anaszewski" <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	"Tomi Valkeinen" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	"Doug Anderson" <dianders@google.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: add support for atomic update
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 21:08:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150720200819.GN11162@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150720214913.73c47fa6@bbrezillon>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1328 bytes --]

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:49:13PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:31:57PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:

> > > - dropped pwm-regulator patches (should be submitted separately)

> > I think the second patch needs to go in with this series doesn't it?  It
> > was just the enable one that was good to go immediately IIRC.

> I was planning on submitting those two patches after the PWM changes
> have been merged, but you're right, maybe we should think about a proper
> way to smoothly get all of them in the same release.

I see.  We should at least try to get the enable one in this time, I'd
like to just apply it and then either do a cross tree merge for the one
making use of the new functionality or (if the rest of the series gets
held up for some reason) just letting it get merged via Linus' tree.

> I have rebased my work on top your regulator/topic/pwm branch containing
> Lee's work [1].

> Note that patch 1 has changed a bit to take Lee's additions into
> account.

> Thierry, could you create a branch based on Mark's regulator/topic/pwm
> branch ?
> If everybody agrees on the solution I'll send a v3 rebasing my work on
> top of this topic branch.

I think that's fine for me, I can tag the PWM branch in my tree and
Thierry can pull that.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-20 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-20 15:31 [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
     [not found] ` <1437406327-6207-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-20 15:31   ` [PATCH v2 01/10] pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts Boris Brezillon
2015-10-06 10:09     ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-07-20 15:31   ` [PATCH v2 02/10] pwm: define a new pwm_state struct Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32   ` [PATCH v2 04/10] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] pwm: move the enabled/disabled info to pwm_state struct Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] pwm: declare a default PWM state Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] pwm: add information about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] pwm: rockchip: add initial state retrieval Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: " Mark Brown
2015-07-20 19:49   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-20 20:08     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2015-07-20 20:21       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-25  6:36 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-08-17  7:18   ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150720200819.GN11162@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=cooloney@gmail.com \
    --cc=dianders@google.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=j.anaszewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox