Re: [PATCH v2] ethernet:arc: Fix racing of TX ring buffer

[Francois Romieu <romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>]

Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org> :
[...]
> I dont agree here. A dma_wmb would have an effect to "data" and "info", yes,
> but it would have absolutely no effect to skb_tx_timestamp(), since there
> is no dma access involved here. In fact skb_tx_timestamp() could probably
> be even reordered to appear after the dma_wmb.
>
> Anyway, there is the wmb() directly after the assignment to "info". _This_
> barrier  should ensure that skb_tx_timestamp() (along with a flush of data
> and info to DMA) is executed before "txbd_curr" is advanced.
> This means that the corresponding skb cant be freed prematurely by tx_clean().

The concern here is about sending adequate PTP payload on the network.

skb_tx_timestamp() is used for network clock synchronization. Some extra
information must be transmitted. Be it through direct payload change
or through indirect control, it _is_ related to dma.

Several (most ?) skb_tx_timestamp() misuses blur the picture: CPU vs device
sync is of course way below the radar when the driver crashes because of
plain use-after-free skb_tx_timestamp() :o/

-- 
Ueimor