* [bug report] phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: support otg-port for rk3399
@ 2016-11-17 11:04 Dan Carpenter
2016-11-22 9:16 ` wlf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2016-11-17 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wulf-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw
Cc: linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r
Hello William Wu,
The patch 0c42fe48fd23: "phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: support otg-port
for rk3399" from Nov 7, 2016, leads to the following static checker
warning:
drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c:998 rockchip_usb2phy_otg_port_init()
warn: 'rphy->edev' isn't an ERR_PTR
drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
989 ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(rphy->dev, rport->bvalid_irq, NULL,
990 rockchip_usb2phy_bvalid_irq,
991 IRQF_ONESHOT,
992 "rockchip_usb2phy_bvalid", rport);
993 if (ret) {
994 dev_err(rphy->dev, "failed to request otg-bvalid irq handle\n");
995 goto out;
996 }
997
998 if (!IS_ERR(rphy->edev)) {
I think the static checker is correct that this check should be removed.
The rest of the code assumes ->edev is a valid pointer.
999 rport->event_nb.notifier_call = rockchip_otg_event;
1000
1001 ret = extcon_register_notifier(rphy->edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST,
1002 &rport->event_nb);
1003 if (ret)
1004 dev_err(rphy->dev, "register USB HOST notifier failed\n");
1005 }
1006
1007 out:
1008 return ret;
1009 }
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [bug report] phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: support otg-port for rk3399
2016-11-17 11:04 [bug report] phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: support otg-port for rk3399 Dan Carpenter
@ 2016-11-22 9:16 ` wlf
[not found] ` <81fc5933-7bee-2d83-f8ef-a951355c4248-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: wlf @ 2016-11-22 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r
Dear Dan,
在 2016年11月17日 19:04, Dan Carpenter 写道:
> Hello William Wu,
>
> The patch 0c42fe48fd23: "phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: support otg-port
> for rk3399" from Nov 7, 2016, leads to the following static checker
> warning:
>
> drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c:998 rockchip_usb2phy_otg_port_init()
> warn: 'rphy->edev' isn't an ERR_PTR
>
> drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> 989 ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(rphy->dev, rport->bvalid_irq, NULL,
> 990 rockchip_usb2phy_bvalid_irq,
> 991 IRQF_ONESHOT,
> 992 "rockchip_usb2phy_bvalid", rport);
> 993 if (ret) {
> 994 dev_err(rphy->dev, "failed to request otg-bvalid irq handle\n");
> 995 goto out;
> 996 }
> 997
> 998 if (!IS_ERR(rphy->edev)) {
>
> I think the static checker is correct that this check should be removed.
> The rest of the code assumes ->edev is a valid pointer.
Yes, you are right. This static checker can be removed safely.
Thanks very much for your help.
Best regards,
wulf
>
> 999 rport->event_nb.notifier_call = rockchip_otg_event;
> 1000
> 1001 ret = extcon_register_notifier(rphy->edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST,
> 1002 &rport->event_nb);
> 1003 if (ret)
> 1004 dev_err(rphy->dev, "register USB HOST notifier failed\n");
> 1005 }
> 1006
> 1007 out:
> 1008 return ret;
> 1009 }
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-11-25 11:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-11-17 11:04 [bug report] phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: support otg-port for rk3399 Dan Carpenter
2016-11-22 9:16 ` wlf
[not found] ` <81fc5933-7bee-2d83-f8ef-a951355c4248-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-25 11:18 ` [patch] phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: remove an unneeded check Dan Carpenter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox