public inbox for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	"Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>,
	"Laszlo Fiat" <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready
Date: Mon,  5 May 2025 11:26:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250505092603.286623-7-cassel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250505092603.286623-6-cassel@kernel.org>

Commit ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can
detect Link Up") changed so that we no longer call dw_pcie_wait_for_link(),
and instead enumerate the bus when receiving a Link Up IRQ.

Laszlo Fiat reported (off-list) that his PLEXTOR PX-256M8PeGN NVMe SSD is
no longer functional, and simply reverting commit ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI:
dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can detect Link Up") makes his
SSD functional again.

It seems that we are enumerating the bus before the endpoint is ready.
Adding a msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS) before enumerating the bus in the
threaded IRQ handler makes the SSD functional once again.

What appears to happen is that before ec9fd499b9c6, we called
dw_pcie_wait_for_link(), and in the first iteration of the loop, the link
will never be up (because the link was just started),
dw_pcie_wait_for_link() will then sleep for LINK_WAIT_SLEEP_MS (90 ms),
before trying again.

This means that even if a driver was missing a msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS)
(100 ms), because of the call to dw_pcie_wait_for_link(), enumerating the
bus would essentially be delayed by that time anyway (because of the sleep
LINK_WAIT_SLEEP_MS (90 ms)).

While we could add the msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS) after deasserting PERST,
that would essentially bring back an unconditional delay during synchronous
probe (the whole reason to use a Link Up IRQ was to avoid an unconditional
delay during probe).

Thus, add the msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS) before enumerating the bus in the
IRQ handler. This way, we will not have an unconditional delay during boot
for unpopulated PCIe slots.

Cc: Laszlo Fiat <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>
Fixes: ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can detect Link Up")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
---
Hello Laszlo,

I know you have already tested this, but could you please send
your Tested-by tag to this patch?

 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
index 7a6a95dc877a..ed8e3dfe80e0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
@@ -471,6 +471,7 @@ static irqreturn_t rockchip_pcie_rc_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
 	if (reg & PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED) {
 		if (rockchip_pcie_link_up(pci)) {
 			dev_dbg(dev, "Received Link up event. Starting enumeration!\n");
+			msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS);
 			/* Rescan the bus to enumerate endpoint devices */
 			pci_lock_rescan_remove();
 			pci_rescan_bus(pp->bridge->bus);
-- 
2.49.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-05  9:26 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Link Up IRQ fixes Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05  9:26 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-05-05 14:09   ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05  9:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Replace PERST sleep time with proper macro Niklas Cassel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-06-11 10:51 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: " Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 12:33   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-11 21:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 11:19     ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-12 11:38       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 11:40         ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-12 12:21           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 13:00             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 14:44               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 15:03                 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 15:24                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 16:51                     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250505092603.286623-7-cassel@kernel.org \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=18255117159@163.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=laszlo.fiat@proton.me \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox