From: Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
To: alchark@flipper.net
Cc: tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net, heiko@sntech.de,
chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] accel/rocket: add RK3576 NPU (RKNN) support
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 13:43:01 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260726014301.411518-1-gahing@gahingwoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260725121601.2970185-1-gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Correcting myself before anyone builds on it.
I wrote yesterday:
> The per-op reset is not a workaround, to be clear -- after 90 of them the
> NPU power domain can't reach idle at power-off and that times out the
> shared regulator path (-110) and takes the box down.
That mechanism is wrong. There is no power-domain problem. What I was
looking at was a serial console printk flood: my test script ran
'dmesg -n 8', the debug kernel emits several hundred register-dump lines
per op, and at 115200 baud that blocks interrupts long enough to time out
the PMIC I2C. The symptoms I misread --
dwmmc_rockchip: Unexpected interrupt latency
cpu4: _set_opp_voltage: failed to set voltage: -110
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks
rockchip-pm-domain: failed to set idle on domain 'nputop', val=0
-- are that signature, not the NPU's. It reproduces with zero resets, a
single-op model and the whole probe disabled, and 'dmesg -n 4' makes it
go away entirely. So please disregard that paragraph; if you were about
to look at RK3576 genpd on account of it, don't.
The conclusion it was attached to still stands, for a different and duller
reason: the per-op reset is not a workaround because it does not make the
MAC produce anything, not because it breaks power-down.
Two other numbers from that mail need tightening, both re-measured on a
quiet console:
- The wall itself is unchanged and is not a console artifact. op0 fetches
and computes (top dt_rd=9408 wt_rd=96, core dt_wr=25088, output
distinct=238); every later op reads exactly nothing and writes a
degenerate surface.
- "90 resets, 87 interrupts" was one run and I implied a 1:1. It isn't:
90 resets now give 63 interrupts. What holds is the qualitative part --
dozens of completion interrupts in a single power session against
exactly one without resets, and the per-layer input and weight fetch
returning in full.
The part of that mail I'd still stand behind is the first half: the vendor
is interrupt-driven on the same GIC lines, INTERRUPT_MASK 0x300 is writable
and the line does fire, bit 31 is hardware-set and no register write clears
it, and the v3 fixes I listed.
Sorry for the noise.
Jiaxing
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-26 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-18 3:11 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] accel/rocket: RK3576 NPU (RKNN) enablement Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3576-rknn-core Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 7:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] pmdomain/rockchip: add optional per-domain power-on settle delay Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-29 15:20 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-07-30 11:32 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-30 22:57 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] pmdomain/rockchip: cycle optional power-domain resets on power-on Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] iommu/rockchip: take all DT clocks Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] iommu/rockchip: clear stale page faults before enabling stall Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] accel/rocket: add RK3576 NPU (RKNN) support Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-21 13:02 ` Alexey Charkov
2026-07-25 12:16 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-26 1:43 ` Jiaxing Hu [this message]
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3576: add NPU (RKNN) nodes Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-18 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3576-rock-4d: enable NPU Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-26 15:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] accel/rocket: RK3576 NPU (RKNN) enablement Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260726014301.411518-1-gahing@gahingwoo.com \
--to=gahing@gahingwoo.com \
--cc=alchark@flipper.net \
--cc=chaoyi.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox