Linux real-time development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
To: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
	 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	 Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	 Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	 Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	 bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v3 2/9] mm/slab, slub_kunit: register kprobe to trigger _nolock APIs
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 14:41:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajvczSpMOGWFhe30@pedro-suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615-kfree_rcu_nolock-v3-2-70a54f3775bb@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 08:05:56PM +0900, Harry Yoo (Oracle) wrote:
> Since kmalloc_nolock() always fails in NMI and hardirq contexts on
> PREEMPT_RT, slub_kunit cannot properly test _nolock() APIs.
> 
> Register a kprobe pre-handler to invoke kmalloc_nolock() and
> kfree_nolock() in the middle of the slab allocator. However, do not
> register the handler on UP kernels [1].

Maybe explain in the commit message why that is?
 
> To attach the pre-handler while s->cpu_sheaves->lock or n->list_lock
> is held, add a wrapper function for lockdep_assert_held() that calls
> a no-op function slab_attach_kprobe_locked() on debug builds. The

Why lockdep? Wouldn't it make more sense to add these triggers after
locking these locks?

> function is optimized away when neither CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING nor
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is selected and register_kprobe() fails.
> 
> The function calls barrier() to prevent the compiler from optimizing
> away its callsites. Otherwise, the compiler may consider the function
> does not have any side effect and remove callsites.

My wider comment is the following: this looks very useful but perhaps should
be lifted to Kunit itself? There's already function redirection (which could
be used for this as well). I don't know if that suits your purposes?
Choosing to say "I want to hook this random function using kprobe and give
it custom behavior" sounds lovely for all sorts of testing.

-- 
Pedro

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-24 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-15 11:05 [PATCH for-next v3 0/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 1/9] slub_kunit: fall back to SW perf events when HW PMU is not available Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 12:58   ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-15 20:01   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-16  5:23     ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 2/9] mm/slab, slub_kunit: register kprobe to trigger _nolock APIs Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 20:04   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-16  6:57   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 13:41   ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 3/9] mm/slab: handle the !allow_spin case in kfree_rcu_sheaf() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  7:55   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-16  9:20     ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-17  5:32     ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-17  5:58       ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 14:28   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 4/9] mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16  9:51   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 14:30   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 5/9] mm/slab: extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 13:03   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 14:37   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 6/9] mm/slab: allow kfree_rcu_sheaf() on PREEMPT_RT Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 17:24   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-17  5:14     ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-17  5:38       ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-17 20:40         ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-18 12:46           ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-18 16:26             ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 7/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 17:28   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-21  0:29   ` XIAO WU
2026-06-22  5:28     ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-22 14:56       ` XIAO WU
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 8/9] mm/slab: introduce struct kfree_rcu_head and use in kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 17:36   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 9/9] slub_kunit: extend the test for kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-16 17:38   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-15 11:43 ` [PATCH for-next v3 0/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo
2026-06-15 20:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-16  4:57   ` Harry Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajvczSpMOGWFhe30@pedro-suse \
    --to=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox