* [PATCH] Missing hunk from rt-mutex-core.patch
@ 2009-05-26 20:11 Jan Blunck
2009-05-28 7:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Blunck @ 2009-05-26 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rt-users; +Cc: tglx
Somehow the following hunk was lost during the port to 2.6.29. Without it
calling sysrq-t or similar gives you very strange results ;)
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: b/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ static inline void mm_init_owner(struct
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MM_OWNER */
-#define TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR "RSDTtZX"
+#define TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR "RMSDTtZX"
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static inline int task_is_current(struct task_struct *task)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Missing hunk from rt-mutex-core.patch
2009-05-26 20:11 [PATCH] Missing hunk from rt-mutex-core.patch Jan Blunck
@ 2009-05-28 7:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2009-05-28 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Blunck; +Cc: linux-rt-users
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Jan Blunck wrote:
> Somehow the following hunk was lost during the port to 2.6.29. Without it
> calling sysrq-t or similar gives you very strange results ;)
Good catch.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-28 7:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-26 20:11 [PATCH] Missing hunk from rt-mutex-core.patch Jan Blunck
2009-05-28 7:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox