From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
To: Josh Cartwright <joshc@ni.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>,
Kai Kang <kai.kang@windriver.com>,
"Song.Li" <Song.Li@windriver.com>,
Jesse Zhang <sen.zhang@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rt-tests 0/4] build tweaks and a bug fix
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:50:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150828125013.77d181b0@sluggy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1440720422.git.joshc@ni.com>
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:19:47 -0500
Josh Cartwright <joshc@ni.com> wrote:
> Hey John, Clark-
>
> This series has a few minor rt-tests tweaks that make it a bit easier to build
> and package rt-tests for the bizarro build demands in the embedded space. With
> a bug fix thrown in for good measure.
>
> The first patch breaks the assumption that build host == target; the second
> patch allows a packager to more easily split hwlatdetect into a separate
> package. (Both of these patches are unchanged since Darren's original
> submission in 2012[1]).
>
> The third patch works around crappy gzip implementations.
>
> The forth patch fixes a hypothetical (as far as I know) bug in hackbench's
> error handling.
>
> A form of all of these patches has been carried out-of-tree in the OpenEmbedded
> project for years now :(. They are more widely useful; as such, it's time to
> land them in rt-tests proper.
>
> Thanks,
> Josh
>
These look reasonable to me Josh. I'll pull 'em in and we'll beat on
them for a while.
Clark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-28 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-28 0:19 [PATCH rt-tests 0/4] build tweaks and a bug fix Josh Cartwright
2015-08-28 0:19 ` [PATCH rt-tests 1/4] rt-tests: Allow for user-specified PYLIB Josh Cartwright
2015-09-02 12:53 ` John Kacur
2015-08-28 0:19 ` [PATCH rt-tests 2/4] rt-tests: Break out install_hwlatdetect Josh Cartwright
2015-09-02 12:56 ` John Kacur
2015-08-28 0:19 ` [PATCH rt-tests 3/4] rt-tests: workaround poor gzip implementations Josh Cartwright
2015-09-02 12:58 ` John Kacur
2015-08-28 0:19 ` [PATCH rt-tests 4/4] hackbench: cleanup error handling in create_worker Josh Cartwright
2015-09-02 13:01 ` John Kacur
2015-08-28 17:50 ` Clark Williams [this message]
2015-08-28 17:54 ` [PATCH rt-tests 0/4] build tweaks and a bug fix Darren Hart
2015-08-28 18:11 ` Josh Cartwright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150828125013.77d181b0@sluggy \
--to=williams@redhat.com \
--cc=Song.Li@windriver.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=joshc@ni.com \
--cc=kai.kang@windriver.com \
--cc=liezhi.yang@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sen.zhang@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox