public inbox for linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
To: Manikandan Ramachandran <crmanik@gmail.com>
Cc: David Sommerseth <davids@redhat.com>, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Query regarding 2.6.335 RT and Non-RT performance
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 07:59:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6D46C7.5020209@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimzwSq_8A6vQftOUptpSkhY5nbc37ihx=r=Ff33@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/17/2010 03:22 PM, Manikandan Ramachandran wrote:


> I see a scenario where higher priority task is ready to run but lower
> priority IRQ thread is hogging the cpu. Please see the timeline log
> below:
>
> GIVE ffff0c1c [Comment: High priority IRQ thread wakes up high
> priority process at jiffy 0xffff0c1c]
> **ffff0c21**##ffff0c21##**ffff0c21**##ffff0c21##**ffff0c21**##ffff0c21##**ffff0c21**##ffff0c21##**ffff0c21**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c23**##ffff0c23##**ffff0c23**##ffff0c23##**ffff0c23**##ffff0c24##**ffff0c24**##ffff0c24##**ffff0c24**##ffff0c24##
> [Comment: Low priority IDE[ide_intr] handler hogs CPU for almost 3 ms]
> GOTffff0c26 [Comment: High priority task wakes up after 10 ms!!]
>
> I fail to understand why scheduler failed to schedule high priority
> task 10 times in a row. FYI, I have put IDE thread to SCHED_NORMAL
> while high priority thread and task to SCHED_FIFO.

Not really sure from the above what's going on, what priorities
you are running at, etc.

You might want look at the output of "ps -eLo pid,rtprio,policy,comm"
to see if you can confirm your scheduler attributes.

thanks,
Nivedita

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-19 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <AANLkTik4U-ua1zi5r5n4uw8oA-cQOO0zev__OuCto7CP@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-17  6:07 ` Query regarding 2.6.335 RT and Non-RT performance Manikandan Ramachandran
2010-08-17 15:54   ` Mark Knecht
2010-08-17 17:19   ` David Sommerseth
2010-08-17 18:24     ` Manikandan Ramachandran
2010-08-17 19:45       ` Nivedita Singhvi
2010-08-17 22:22         ` Manikandan Ramachandran
2010-08-19 14:59           ` Nivedita Singhvi [this message]
2010-08-19 16:06             ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2010-08-19 18:15               ` Manikandan Ramachandran
2010-08-19 19:14                 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2010-08-23 14:26           ` gowrishankar
2010-08-17 20:24       ` Mark Knecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C6D46C7.5020209@us.ibm.com \
    --to=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=crmanik@gmail.com \
    --cc=davids@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox