From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@thebigcorporation.com>
To: Manikandan Ramachandran <crmanik@gmail.com>
Cc: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>,
David Sommerseth <davids@redhat.com>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Query regarding 2.6.335 RT and Non-RT performance
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:14:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6D82AF.7020806@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikFMnr=5=rgU5V7cny5j=ZNLVUJMEewvAOpbpEx@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/19/2010 11:15 AM, Manikandan Ramachandran wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
> <thebigcorporation@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 07:59 -0700, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
>>> On 08/17/2010 03:22 PM, Manikandan Ramachandran wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I see a scenario where higher priority task is ready to run but lower
>>>> priority IRQ thread is hogging the cpu. Please see the timeline log
>>>> below:
>>>>
>>>> GIVE ffff0c1c [Comment: High priority IRQ thread wakes up high
>>>> priority process at jiffy 0xffff0c1c]
>>>> **ffff0c21**##ffff0c21##**ffff0c21**##ffff0c21##**ffff0c21**##ffff0c21##**ffff0c21**##ffff0c21##**ffff0c21**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c22**##ffff0c22##**ffff0c23**##ffff0c23##**ffff0c23**##ffff0c23##**ffff0c23**##ffff0c24##**ffff0c24**##ffff0c24##**ffff0c24**##ffff0c24##
>>>> [Comment: Low priority IDE[ide_intr] handler hogs CPU for almost 3 ms]
>>>> GOTffff0c26 [Comment: High priority task wakes up after 10 ms!!]
>>>>
>>>> I fail to understand why scheduler failed to schedule high priority
>>>> task 10 times in a row. FYI, I have put IDE thread to SCHED_NORMAL
>>>> while high priority thread and task to SCHED_FIFO.
>>> Not really sure from the above what's going on, what priorities
>>> you are running at, etc.
>>>
>>> You might want look at the output of "ps -eLo pid,rtprio,policy,comm"
>>> to see if you can confirm your scheduler attributes.
>>>
>> Also, use the tracing facilities, as its hard to understand your time
>> line and the source of it.
>>
>> I think if your priorities are right, your kernel config is right, and
>> your measurement tool doesn't interfere, 10 ms latency is incredibly
>> unlikely.
>>
>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Nivedita
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
> I see many tracing options. Any trace config in particular?
>
>
Steve's latency tracing can generate a time-stamped stack dump of the
Kernel code-path that blocks the RT task you are trying to run.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-19 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AANLkTik4U-ua1zi5r5n4uw8oA-cQOO0zev__OuCto7CP@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-17 6:07 ` Query regarding 2.6.335 RT and Non-RT performance Manikandan Ramachandran
2010-08-17 15:54 ` Mark Knecht
2010-08-17 17:19 ` David Sommerseth
2010-08-17 18:24 ` Manikandan Ramachandran
2010-08-17 19:45 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2010-08-17 22:22 ` Manikandan Ramachandran
2010-08-19 14:59 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2010-08-19 16:06 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2010-08-19 18:15 ` Manikandan Ramachandran
2010-08-19 19:14 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich [this message]
2010-08-23 14:26 ` gowrishankar
2010-08-17 20:24 ` Mark Knecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C6D82AF.7020806@gmail.com \
--to=sven@thebigcorporation.com \
--cc=crmanik@gmail.com \
--cc=davids@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox