* Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-pic32: handle clock enable failure
[not found] <tencent_7FCEEF77654C7D6B110DE49D2E98531A2006@qq.com>
@ 2026-08-20 9:35 ` Markus Elfring
2026-08-20 9:39 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2026-08-20 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 1298662399, linux-rtc, Alexandre Belloni; +Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors
…
> Check early clk_prepare_enable(pdata->clk) return in pic32_rtc_probe.
I find such a wording approach improvable.
How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
See also once more:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst?h=v7.2#n34
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v7.2#n145
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v7.2#n792
The message recipient specifications should be extended.
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-pic32: handle clock enable failure
2026-08-20 9:35 ` [PATCH] rtc: rtc-pic32: handle clock enable failure Markus Elfring
@ 2026-08-20 9:39 ` Robert P. J. Day
2026-08-20 10:04 ` Markus Elfring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2026-08-20 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring
Cc: 1298662399, linux-rtc, Alexandre Belloni, LKML, kernel-janitors
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 321 bytes --]
On Thu, 20 Aug 2026, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > Check early clk_prepare_enable(pdata->clk) return in pic32_rtc_probe.
>
> I find such a wording approach improvable.
> How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
How many times are you going to ask this same question?
rday
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: rtc: rtc-pic32: handle clock enable failure
2026-08-20 9:39 ` Robert P. J. Day
@ 2026-08-20 10:04 ` Markus Elfring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2026-08-20 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day, linux-rtc
Cc: 1298662399, Alexandre Belloni, LKML, kernel-janitors
>> …
>>> Check early clk_prepare_enable(pdata->clk) return in pic32_rtc_probe.
>>
>> I find such a wording approach improvable.
>> How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
>
> How many times are you going to ask this same question?
I got the impression that another reminder would be needed also for the presented patch.
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-20 10:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <tencent_7FCEEF77654C7D6B110DE49D2E98531A2006@qq.com>
2026-08-20 9:35 ` [PATCH] rtc: rtc-pic32: handle clock enable failure Markus Elfring
2026-08-20 9:39 ` Robert P. J. Day
2026-08-20 10:04 ` Markus Elfring
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox