From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com,
k.kozlowski@samsung.com, javier@osg.samsung.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, a.zummo@towertech.it,
cw00.choi@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V4 1/6] regmap: irq: add apis to unmap the mapped irq
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:59:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160208165912.GK7265@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B8C484.7000309@nvidia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1718 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:08:28PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Monday 08 February 2016 08:25 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 08:07:22PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >>Before removing irq domains, it is require to unmap all
> >>mapped interrupt from that domain. Currently there is API
> >>to map the interrupt on chip as regmap_irq_get_virq() for
> >>creating mapping. Add equivalent API to dispose the mapped
> >>irq in irq domains.
> >This makes no sense to me. Why would you ever want to unmap the
> >interrupts separately to destroying the domain
> This is the requirement from irq_domain_remove(). This is what we have in
> irq_domain_remove():
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> I am adding the API equivalent to regmap_irq_get_virq() to unmap virtual irq
> here.
This does not explain why anyone would ever want to use this interface
(which was my question), why would anyone ever want to do this as a
separate step?
> >and why would you ever
> >want to destroy the domain without unmapping the interrupts?
> That's exactlly we are trying to do, unmap interrupt in client level before
> destroying domain.
Again, why would any client ever want to skip this step?
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-08 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-06 14:37 [rtc-linux] [PATCH V4 0/6] rtc: max77686: make max77686 rtc driver as IP driver Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-06 14:37 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH V4 1/6] regmap: irq: add apis to unmap the mapped irq Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-08 14:55 ` [rtc-linux] " Mark Brown
2016-02-08 16:38 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-08 16:59 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2016-02-08 16:56 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-08 18:19 ` Mark Brown
2016-02-09 5:16 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-09 9:08 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-09 11:27 ` Mark Brown
2016-02-09 11:21 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-06 14:37 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH V4 2/6] rtc: max77686: fix checkpatch error Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-06 14:37 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH V4 3/6] rtc: max77686: use rtc regmap to access RTC registers Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-06 14:37 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH V4 4/6] rtc: max77686: avoid reference of parent device info multiple places Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-06 14:37 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH V4 5/6] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-06 14:37 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH V4 6/6] rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap, irq chip locally Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-08 10:20 ` [rtc-linux] " Laxman Dewangan
2016-02-08 10:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160208165912.GK7265@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox