public inbox for linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: adapt allowed RTC update error
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 23:00:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201203220027.GB74177@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zh2ubny2.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

On 03/12/2020 22:05:09+0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 2) I2C/SPI ...
> 
>    tsched t0                 t1                     t2
>           transfer(newsec)   RTC update (newsec)    RTC increments seconds
> 
>    Lets assume that ttransfer = t1 - t0 is known.

Note that ttransfer is one of the reason why setting set_offset_nsec
from the RTC driver is not a good idea. The same RTC may be on busses
with different rates and there is no way to know that. I think that was
one of my objections at the time.

ttransfer is not a function of the RTC model but rather of how it is
integrated in the system.

> 
>    tinc is the same as above = t2 - t1
> 
>    Again, lets assume that the event is accurate for now and ignore the fuzz
>    logic, i.e. tsched == t0
> 
>    So tsched has to be ttot = t2 - t0 _before_ wallclock reaches t2 and
>    increments seconds.
> 

I had a rough week and I'm probably not awake enough to follow
completely but is that thinking correct?

For the mc146818, you have t1 - t0 which is probably negligible and t2 -
T& == 500 ms

For most of the other RTCs, you have t1 - t0 is somewhat important,
probably around 100 to 150µs and t2 - t1 is 1s. I would think that what
is needed is tsched has to be t1-t0 before wallclock reaches t1. In that
case t2 doesn't matter, it will always be 1s after t1.

>    In this case newsec = t1.tv_sec = (t0 + ttransfer).tv_sec
> 
>    So now the fuzz logic for this is:
> 
>       newtime = t0 + ttransfer;
> 
>       if (newtime.tv_nsec < FUZZ)
>           newsec = newtime.tv_sec;
>       else if (newtime.tv_nsec > NSEC_PER_SEC - FUZZ)
>           newsec = newtime.tv_sec + 1;
>       else
>           goto fail;
> 
>    Again the first condition handles the case where t1 >= tsched and the
>    second one where t1 < tsched.
> 
> So now we have two options to fix this:
> 
>    1) Use a negative sync_offset for devices which need #1 above
>       (rtc_cmos & similar)
> 
>       That requires setting tsched to t2 - abs(sync_offset)
> 
>    2) Use always a positive sync_offset and a flag which tells
>       rtc_tv_nsec_ok() whether it needs to add or subtract.
> 
> #1 is good enough. All it takes is a comment at the timer start code why
> abs() is required.
> 
> Let me hack that up along with the hrtimer muck.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-03 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20201201143835.2054508-1-mlichvar@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <20201201161224.GF5487@ziepe.ca>
     [not found]   ` <20201201171420.GN1900232@localhost>
     [not found]     ` <20201201173540.GH5487@ziepe.ca>
     [not found]       ` <87mtywe2zu.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
     [not found]         ` <20201202162723.GJ5487@ziepe.ca>
     [not found]           ` <87a6uwdnfn.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
     [not found]             ` <20201202205418.GN5487@ziepe.ca>
     [not found]               ` <874kl3eu8p.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
2020-12-03  1:14                 ` [PATCH] rtc: adapt allowed RTC update error Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03  2:04                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-03  2:10                   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-03 15:39                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 16:16                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-03 21:05                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 21:31                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 22:36                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-04 13:02                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-04 14:08                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-04 14:37                                   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-04 14:46                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-04 15:08                                       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-04 15:57                                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-04 16:35                                           ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-03 22:00                           ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2020-12-04  9:34                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-04  9:51                               ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-04 10:44                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 17:29                       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-03 19:52                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 15:52                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-03 16:07                       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-03 20:10                         ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201203220027.GB74177@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox