public inbox for linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: adapt allowed RTC update error
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 10:34:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87im9hc3u2.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201203220027.GB74177@piout.net>

On Thu, Dec 03 2020 at 23:00, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 03/12/2020 22:05:09+0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> 2) I2C/SPI ...
>> 
>>    tsched t0                 t1                     t2
>>           transfer(newsec)   RTC update (newsec)    RTC increments seconds
>> 
>>    Lets assume that ttransfer = t1 - t0 is known.
>
> Note that ttransfer is one of the reason why setting set_offset_nsec
> from the RTC driver is not a good idea. The same RTC may be on busses
> with different rates and there is no way to know that. I think that was
> one of my objections at the time.
>
> ttransfer is not a function of the RTC model but rather of how it is
> integrated in the system.

Yes, but it's the right place to store that information.

It's a fundamental problem of the RTC driver because that's the one
which has to be able to tell the caller about it. The caller has
absolutely no way to figure it out because it does not even know what
type of RTC is there.

So either the RTC knows the requirements for tsched, e.g. the MC14xxx
datasheet, or it can retrieve that information from DT or by querying
the underlying bus mechanics for the xfer time estimate or just by
timing an xfer for reference.

Thanks,

        tglx






  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-04  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20201201143835.2054508-1-mlichvar@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <20201201161224.GF5487@ziepe.ca>
     [not found]   ` <20201201171420.GN1900232@localhost>
     [not found]     ` <20201201173540.GH5487@ziepe.ca>
     [not found]       ` <87mtywe2zu.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
     [not found]         ` <20201202162723.GJ5487@ziepe.ca>
     [not found]           ` <87a6uwdnfn.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
     [not found]             ` <20201202205418.GN5487@ziepe.ca>
     [not found]               ` <874kl3eu8p.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
2020-12-03  1:14                 ` [PATCH] rtc: adapt allowed RTC update error Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03  2:04                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-03  2:10                   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-03 15:39                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 16:16                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-03 21:05                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 21:31                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 22:36                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-04 13:02                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-04 14:08                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-04 14:37                                   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-04 14:46                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-04 15:08                                       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-04 15:57                                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-04 16:35                                           ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-03 22:00                           ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-04  9:34                             ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-12-04  9:51                               ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-04 10:44                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 17:29                       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-03 19:52                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 15:52                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-03 16:07                       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-03 20:10                         ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87im9hc3u2.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox