From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] dt-bindings: rtc: renesas,rzn1-rtc: Add RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H support
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 17:58:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706175846.7964C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706175138.12587-2-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The RZ/T2H RTC variant adds a 1Hz clock output capability but the binding schema fails to document and require the `#clock-cells` property.
--
commit 521c08a40b8b1ac0b30dec5219ca0271639457ef
Author: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
dt-bindings: rtc: renesas,rzn1-rtc: Add RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H support
This commit adds compatible strings for the RTC block found on the Renesas
RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H SoCs. It also updates the binding schema to require the
additional clock inputs used by these variants.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/renesas,rzn1-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/renesas,rzn1-rtc.yaml
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/renesas,rzn1-rtc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/renesas,rzn1-rtc.yaml
[ ... ]
> @@ -54,6 +58,23 @@ required:
> - clock-names
> - power-domains
>
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: rtc.yaml#
> +
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - renesas,r9a09g077-rtc
> + - renesas,r9a09g087-rtc
> + then:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + minItems: 2
> + clock-names:
> + minItems: 2
[Severity: Medium]
The commit message mentions that the RZ/T2H RTC variant supports a 1Hz clock
output signal on the RTCAT1HZ pin. Since this introduces a clock provider
capability, shouldn't the #clock-cells property be documented and required
here with an appropriate const constraint?
Without documenting this property, adding #clock-cells to an RTC node using
the renesas,r9a09g077-rtc compatible string will cause device trees to fail
dt_binding_check validation due to the unevaluatedProperties: false constraint.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706175138.12587-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 17:51 [PATCH v3 00/12] Add RTC support for Renesas RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H SoCs Prabhakar
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] dt-bindings: rtc: renesas,rzn1-rtc: Add RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H support Prabhakar
2026-07-06 17:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] rtc: rzn1: Handle EPROBE_DEFER for optional pps interrupt Prabhakar
2026-07-06 17:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] rtc: rzn1: fix weekday underflow when alarm crosses month boundary Prabhakar
2026-07-06 18:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] rtc: rzn1: Fix malformed MODULE_AUTHOR string Prabhakar
2026-07-06 17:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] rtc: Kconfig: Broaden RTC_DRV_RZN1 dependency to ARCH_RENESAS Prabhakar
2026-07-06 17:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] rtc: rzn1: Fix alarm range check truncation on 32-bit systems Prabhakar
2026-07-06 18:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] rtc: rzn1: Replace remove callback with devm_add_action_or_reset() Prabhakar
2026-07-06 17:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] rtc: rzn1: Dynamically calculate synchronization delay based on clock rate Prabhakar
2026-07-06 17:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] rtc: rzn1: Use temporary variable for struct device Prabhakar
2026-07-06 17:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] rtc: rzn1: Consistently use dev_err_probe() Prabhakar
2026-07-06 17:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] rtc: rzn1: use FIELD_PREP/FIELD_GET and GENMASK for register access Prabhakar
2026-07-06 17:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] rtc: rzn1: Add support for Renesas RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H SoCs Prabhakar
2026-07-06 18:03 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706175846.7964C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox