* [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Always export the internal oscillator
@ 2022-12-29 21:53 Samuel Holland
2022-12-29 23:17 ` Andre Przywara
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Holland @ 2022-12-29 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Belloni, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec
Cc: Samuel Holland, Maxime Ripard, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
linux-rtc, linux-sunxi
On all variants of the hardware, the internal oscillator is one possible
parent for the AR100 clock. It needs to be exported so we can model that
relationship correctly in the devicetree.
Fixes: c56afc1844d6 ("rtc: sun6i: Expose internal oscillator through device tree")
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
---
This patch should be applied before [1] so this patch can be backported.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20221229184011.62925-2-samuel@sholland.org/
drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c | 16 ++++------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
index ed5516089e9a..7038f47d77ff 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
@@ -136,7 +136,6 @@ struct sun6i_rtc_clk_data {
unsigned int fixed_prescaler : 16;
unsigned int has_prescaler : 1;
unsigned int has_out_clk : 1;
- unsigned int export_iosc : 1;
unsigned int has_losc_en : 1;
unsigned int has_auto_swt : 1;
};
@@ -271,10 +270,8 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node,
/* Yes, I know, this is ugly. */
sun6i_rtc = rtc;
- /* Only read IOSC name from device tree if it is exported */
- if (rtc->data->export_iosc)
- of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", 2,
- &iosc_name);
+ of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", 2,
+ &iosc_name);
rtc->int_osc = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy(NULL,
iosc_name,
@@ -315,13 +312,10 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node,
goto err_register;
}
- clk_data->num = 2;
+ clk_data->num = 3;
clk_data->hws[0] = &rtc->hw;
clk_data->hws[1] = __clk_get_hw(rtc->ext_losc);
- if (rtc->data->export_iosc) {
- clk_data->hws[2] = rtc->int_osc;
- clk_data->num = 3;
- }
+ clk_data->hws[2] = rtc->int_osc;
of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data);
return;
@@ -361,7 +355,6 @@ static const struct sun6i_rtc_clk_data sun8i_h3_rtc_data = {
.fixed_prescaler = 32,
.has_prescaler = 1,
.has_out_clk = 1,
- .export_iosc = 1,
};
static void __init sun8i_h3_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node)
@@ -379,7 +372,6 @@ static const struct sun6i_rtc_clk_data sun50i_h6_rtc_data = {
.fixed_prescaler = 32,
.has_prescaler = 1,
.has_out_clk = 1,
- .export_iosc = 1,
.has_losc_en = 1,
.has_auto_swt = 1,
};
--
2.37.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Always export the internal oscillator 2022-12-29 21:53 [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Always export the internal oscillator Samuel Holland @ 2022-12-29 23:17 ` Andre Przywara 2022-12-29 23:42 ` Samuel Holland 2023-01-08 19:43 ` Jernej Škrabec 2023-01-23 23:47 ` Alexandre Belloni 2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Andre Przywara @ 2022-12-29 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Samuel Holland Cc: Alexandre Belloni, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec, Maxime Ripard, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-rtc, linux-sunxi On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 15:53:19 -0600 Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> wrote: Hi Samuel, > On all variants of the hardware, the internal oscillator is one possible > parent for the AR100 clock. It needs to be exported so we can model that > relationship correctly in the devicetree. So do you plan to use this third clock on any SoCs that don't export it yet, like the R40 or V3s, or the older SoCs? This would then create a non-compatible DT change, wouldn't it? Since existing/older kernels cannot resolve clock index 2? Or would that not be used by kernels, or would not be fatal? Cheers, Andre > Fixes: c56afc1844d6 ("rtc: sun6i: Expose internal oscillator through device tree") > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> > --- > This patch should be applied before [1] so this patch can be backported. > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20221229184011.62925-2-samuel@sholland.org/ > > drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c | 16 ++++------------ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c > index ed5516089e9a..7038f47d77ff 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c > @@ -136,7 +136,6 @@ struct sun6i_rtc_clk_data { > unsigned int fixed_prescaler : 16; > unsigned int has_prescaler : 1; > unsigned int has_out_clk : 1; > - unsigned int export_iosc : 1; > unsigned int has_losc_en : 1; > unsigned int has_auto_swt : 1; > }; > @@ -271,10 +270,8 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node, > /* Yes, I know, this is ugly. */ > sun6i_rtc = rtc; > > - /* Only read IOSC name from device tree if it is exported */ > - if (rtc->data->export_iosc) > - of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", 2, > - &iosc_name); > + of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", 2, > + &iosc_name); > > rtc->int_osc = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy(NULL, > iosc_name, > @@ -315,13 +312,10 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node, > goto err_register; > } > > - clk_data->num = 2; > + clk_data->num = 3; > clk_data->hws[0] = &rtc->hw; > clk_data->hws[1] = __clk_get_hw(rtc->ext_losc); > - if (rtc->data->export_iosc) { > - clk_data->hws[2] = rtc->int_osc; > - clk_data->num = 3; > - } > + clk_data->hws[2] = rtc->int_osc; > of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data); > return; > > @@ -361,7 +355,6 @@ static const struct sun6i_rtc_clk_data sun8i_h3_rtc_data = { > .fixed_prescaler = 32, > .has_prescaler = 1, > .has_out_clk = 1, > - .export_iosc = 1, > }; > > static void __init sun8i_h3_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node) > @@ -379,7 +372,6 @@ static const struct sun6i_rtc_clk_data sun50i_h6_rtc_data = { > .fixed_prescaler = 32, > .has_prescaler = 1, > .has_out_clk = 1, > - .export_iosc = 1, > .has_losc_en = 1, > .has_auto_swt = 1, > }; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Always export the internal oscillator 2022-12-29 23:17 ` Andre Przywara @ 2022-12-29 23:42 ` Samuel Holland 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Samuel Holland @ 2022-12-29 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andre Przywara Cc: Alexandre Belloni, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec, Maxime Ripard, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-rtc, linux-sunxi Hi Andre, On 12/29/22 17:17, Andre Przywara wrote: > On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 15:53:19 -0600 > Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> wrote: > > Hi Samuel, > >> On all variants of the hardware, the internal oscillator is one possible >> parent for the AR100 clock. It needs to be exported so we can model that >> relationship correctly in the devicetree. > > So do you plan to use this third clock on any SoCs that don't export it > yet, like the R40 or V3s, or the older SoCs? This would then create a I am targeting A31 and A23/A33 with this change, so I can correct those devicetrees. Currently A31 has the wrong fourth parent for its AR100 clock, and A23/A33 models it completely wrong as a fixed-factor clock. I have ported Crust to A23/A33, and it sets the AR100 parent to IOSC at boot (just like on other SoCs), so it doesn't have to change the parent during suspend/resume. But because the AR100 clock is modeled wrong in Linux, Linux thinks the APB0 clock is running much faster than it really is, and sets a totally wrong divider in the RSB controller, which breaks the RSB bus. > non-compatible DT change, wouldn't it? Since existing/older kernels > cannot resolve clock index 2? With the current patch contents, I expect this change to be backported as far as 5.4. If I set ".export_iosc = 1" for A31 and A23/A33 instead of entirely removing the flag, it could be backported further. So that somewhat mitigates the issue. The other option would be to add IOSC as a fixed clock in the DT, and use that as the AR100 parent. We would still want to make this change now, so we could eventually clean up the DT. > Or would that not be used by kernels, or would not be fatal? It might not be fatal if the AR100 clock isn't set to its IOSC parent. I would have to test this. Regards, Samuel > > Cheers, > Andre > >> Fixes: c56afc1844d6 ("rtc: sun6i: Expose internal oscillator through device tree") >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> >> --- >> This patch should be applied before [1] so this patch can be backported. >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20221229184011.62925-2-samuel@sholland.org/ >> >> drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c | 16 ++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c >> index ed5516089e9a..7038f47d77ff 100644 >> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c >> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c >> @@ -136,7 +136,6 @@ struct sun6i_rtc_clk_data { >> unsigned int fixed_prescaler : 16; >> unsigned int has_prescaler : 1; >> unsigned int has_out_clk : 1; >> - unsigned int export_iosc : 1; >> unsigned int has_losc_en : 1; >> unsigned int has_auto_swt : 1; >> }; >> @@ -271,10 +270,8 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node, >> /* Yes, I know, this is ugly. */ >> sun6i_rtc = rtc; >> >> - /* Only read IOSC name from device tree if it is exported */ >> - if (rtc->data->export_iosc) >> - of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", 2, >> - &iosc_name); >> + of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", 2, >> + &iosc_name); >> >> rtc->int_osc = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy(NULL, >> iosc_name, >> @@ -315,13 +312,10 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node, >> goto err_register; >> } >> >> - clk_data->num = 2; >> + clk_data->num = 3; >> clk_data->hws[0] = &rtc->hw; >> clk_data->hws[1] = __clk_get_hw(rtc->ext_losc); >> - if (rtc->data->export_iosc) { >> - clk_data->hws[2] = rtc->int_osc; >> - clk_data->num = 3; >> - } >> + clk_data->hws[2] = rtc->int_osc; >> of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data); >> return; >> >> @@ -361,7 +355,6 @@ static const struct sun6i_rtc_clk_data sun8i_h3_rtc_data = { >> .fixed_prescaler = 32, >> .has_prescaler = 1, >> .has_out_clk = 1, >> - .export_iosc = 1, >> }; >> >> static void __init sun8i_h3_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node) >> @@ -379,7 +372,6 @@ static const struct sun6i_rtc_clk_data sun50i_h6_rtc_data = { >> .fixed_prescaler = 32, >> .has_prescaler = 1, >> .has_out_clk = 1, >> - .export_iosc = 1, >> .has_losc_en = 1, >> .has_auto_swt = 1, >> }; > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Always export the internal oscillator 2022-12-29 21:53 [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Always export the internal oscillator Samuel Holland 2022-12-29 23:17 ` Andre Przywara @ 2023-01-08 19:43 ` Jernej Škrabec 2023-01-23 23:47 ` Alexandre Belloni 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jernej Škrabec @ 2023-01-08 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexandre Belloni, Chen-Yu Tsai, Samuel Holland Cc: Samuel Holland, Maxime Ripard, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-rtc, linux-sunxi Dne četrtek, 29. december 2022 ob 22:53:19 CET je Samuel Holland napisal(a): > On all variants of the hardware, the internal oscillator is one possible > parent for the AR100 clock. It needs to be exported so we can model that > relationship correctly in the devicetree. > > Fixes: c56afc1844d6 ("rtc: sun6i: Expose internal oscillator through device > tree") Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Best regards, Jernej ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Always export the internal oscillator 2022-12-29 21:53 [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Always export the internal oscillator Samuel Holland 2022-12-29 23:17 ` Andre Przywara 2023-01-08 19:43 ` Jernej Škrabec @ 2023-01-23 23:47 ` Alexandre Belloni 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Alexandre Belloni @ 2023-01-23 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland Cc: Maxime Ripard, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-rtc, linux-sunxi On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 15:53:19 -0600, Samuel Holland wrote: > On all variants of the hardware, the internal oscillator is one possible > parent for the AR100 clock. It needs to be exported so we can model that > relationship correctly in the devicetree. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] rtc: sun6i: Always export the internal oscillator commit: 344f4030f6c50a9db2d03021884c4bf36191b53a Best regards, -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-23 23:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-12-29 21:53 [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Always export the internal oscillator Samuel Holland 2022-12-29 23:17 ` Andre Przywara 2022-12-29 23:42 ` Samuel Holland 2023-01-08 19:43 ` Jernej Škrabec 2023-01-23 23:47 ` Alexandre Belloni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox