From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Bryan Evenson <bevenson@melinkcorp.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
"rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: fix infinite wait for ACKUPD irq
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 10:03:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5369E8C6.1070409@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140506211040.GF11243@piout.net>
On 06/05/2014 23:10, Alexandre Belloni :
> Hi,
>
> On 06/05/2014 at 19:06:56 +0000, Bryan Evenson wrote :
>>
>> I'd assume this patch would be backported to the longterm releases?
>>
>
> If by longterm, you mean the linux4sam tree, 3.10 branch, it is up to
> Nicolas to take it. I believe it will be pretty easy to convince him ;)
Absolutely, it is always easy to convince me with:
- good commit message
- script to reproduce the issue
- follow-up of the patch plus testing
- dialogue between skilled kernel developers
So, yes, I will "ack" the patch and immediately integrate it in our
linux4sam 3.10 branch.
On the other hand, I let Boris add the "stable" tag to his original patch.
Thanks to all of you for this fix. Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20140506211040.GF11243@piout.net>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5369E8C6.1070409@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=bevenson@melinkcorp.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@maxim.org.za \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox