public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] s390x: STSI tests
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:46:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <08a4f2f8-5654-7883-615a-5a8d5f9b72b1@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef4faf31-e9db-f984-94ec-f3c332823b6f@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3395 bytes --]

On 8/20/19 3:21 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 8/20/19 12:55 PM, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> For now let's concentrate on the error conditions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  s390x/Makefile      |   1 +
>>  s390x/stsi.c        | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  s390x/unittests.cfg |   5 +-
>>  3 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 s390x/stsi.c
>>
>> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
>> index b654c56..311ab77 100644
>> --- a/s390x/Makefile
>> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/vector.elf
>>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/gs.elf
>>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/iep.elf
>>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/diag288.elf
>> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/stsi.elf
>>  tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests))
>>  
>>  all: directories test_cases test_cases_binary
>> diff --git a/s390x/stsi.c b/s390x/stsi.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..005f337
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/s390x/stsi.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Store System Information tests
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2019 IBM Corp
>> + *
>> + * Authors:
>> + *  Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> + *
>> + * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> + * under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License version 2.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <libcflat.h>
>> +#include <asm/page.h>
>> +#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>> +#include <asm/interrupt.h>
>> +
>> +static uint8_t pagebuf[PAGE_SIZE * 2] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE * 2)));
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned long stsi(unsigned long *addr,
>> +				 unsigned long fc, uint8_t sel1, uint8_t sel2)
> 
> Return code should be "int", not "long".
> 
> I'd also suggest to use "void *addr" instead of "unsigned long *addr",
> then you don't have to cast the pagebuf when you're calling this function.

Ok

> 
>> +{
>> +	register unsigned long r0 asm("0") = (fc << 28) | sel1;
>> +	register unsigned long r1 asm("1") = sel2;
>> +	int cc;
>> +
>> +	asm volatile("stsi	0(%3)\n"
>> +		     "ipm	 %[cc]\n"
>> +		     "srl	 %[cc],28\n"
>> +		     : "+d" (r0), [cc] "=d" (cc)
>> +		     : "d" (r1), "a" (addr)
>> +		     : "cc", "memory");
>> +	return cc;
>> +}
> 
> Bonus points for putting that function into a header and re-use it in
> skey.c (maybe in a separate patch, though).

I forgot that you added that...
How about moving it to lib/s390/asm/arch_def.h ?

[...]

>> +static void test_fc(void)
>> +{
>> +	report("cc == 3", stsi((void *)pagebuf, 7, 0, 0));
> 
> Shouldn't that line look like this instead:
> 
>     	report("cc == 3", stsi((void *)pagebuf, 7, 0, 0) == 3);
> 
> ?

Yes

> 
>> +	report("r0 == 3", stsi_get_fc((void *)pagebuf));
> 
>     report("r0 >= 3", stsi_get_fc((void *)pagebuf) >= 3);
> 
> ?

Well rather >= 2 because we can also run on lpar with some additional
patches applied. Time to test this under lpar...

> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +int main(void)
>> +{
>> +	report_prefix_push("stsi");
>> +	test_priv();
>> +	test_specs();
>> +	test_fc();
>> +	return report_summary();
>> +}
> 
> How about adding another test for access exceptions? Activate low
> address protection, then store to address 4096 ... and/or check
> "stsi((void *)-0xdeadadd, 1, 0, 0);" ?

Sounds good

> 
>  Thomas
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-21  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-20 10:55 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] s390x: More emulation tests Janosch Frank
2019-08-20 10:55 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] s390x: Support PSW restart boot Janosch Frank
2019-08-20 11:40   ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-20 10:55 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] s390x: Diag288 test Janosch Frank
2019-08-20 11:59   ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-20 12:25     ` Janosch Frank
2019-08-20 12:55       ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-20 15:21         ` Janosch Frank
2019-08-20 15:29           ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-20 10:55 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] s390x: STSI tests Janosch Frank
2019-08-20 13:21   ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-21  8:46     ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2019-08-20 11:11 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] s390x: More emulation tests David Hildenbrand
2019-08-20 11:49   ` Janosch Frank
2019-08-20 19:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-21  8:48   ` Janosch Frank
2019-08-21  8:53     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-21  9:28       ` Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=08a4f2f8-5654-7883-615a-5a8d5f9b72b1@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox