From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/3] s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 18:50:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a9740faae7f375248c60ff5b0753cadc9ed0348.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230221174822.1378667-2-nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Messed up the recipients on the cover letter...
Instructions on s390 must be halfword aligned.
Add two tests for that.
These currently fail when using TCG.
v1 -> v2:
* rebase
* use PSW macros
* simplify odd psw test (thanks Claudio)
* rename some identifiers
* pick up R-b (thanks Claudio)
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch (3):
s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro
s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW
s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address
s390x/spec_ex.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Range-diff against v1:
-: -------- > 1: d82f4fb6 s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro
1: 62f61c07 ! 2: e537797f s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW
@@ Commit message
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
## s390x/spec_ex.c ##
-@@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static void fixup_invalid_psw(struct stack_frame_int *stack)
- /*
- * Load possibly invalid psw, but setup fixup_psw before,
- * so that fixup_invalid_psw() can bring us back onto the right track.
-+ * The provided argument is loaded into register 1.
- * Also acts as compiler barrier, -> none required in expect/check_invalid_psw
- */
--static void load_psw(struct psw psw)
-+static void load_psw_with_arg(struct psw psw, uint64_t arg)
- {
- uint64_t scratch;
-
-@@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static void load_psw(struct psw psw)
- fixup_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
- asm volatile ( "larl %[scratch],0f\n"
- " stg %[scratch],%[fixup_addr]\n"
-+ " lgr %%r1,%[arg]\n"
- " lpswe %[psw]\n"
- "0: nop\n"
- : [scratch] "=&d" (scratch),
- [fixup_addr] "=&T" (fixup_psw.addr)
-- : [psw] "Q" (psw)
-- : "cc", "memory"
-+ : [psw] "Q" (psw),
-+ [arg] "d" (arg)
-+ : "cc", "memory", "%r1"
- );
- }
-
-+static void load_psw(struct psw psw)
-+{
-+ load_psw_with_arg(psw, 0);
-+}
-+
- static void load_short_psw(struct short_psw psw)
- {
- uint64_t scratch;
@@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static void expect_invalid_psw(struct psw psw)
invalid_psw_expected = true;
}
+static void clear_invalid_psw(void)
+{
-+ expected_psw = (struct psw){0};
++ expected_psw = PSW(0, 0);
+ invalid_psw_expected = false;
+}
+
@@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static void expect_invalid_psw(struct psw psw)
{
/* Since the fixup sets this to false we check for false here. */
if (!invalid_psw_expected) {
++ /*
++ * Early exception recognition: pgm_int_id == 0.
++ * Late exception recognition: psw address has been
++ * incremented by pgm_int_id (unpredictable value)
++ */
if (expected_psw.mask == invalid_psw.mask &&
- expected_psw.addr == invalid_psw.addr)
+ expected_psw.addr == invalid_psw.addr - lowcore.pgm_int_id)
@@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static int psw_bit_12_is_1(void)
return check_invalid_psw();
}
++extern char misaligned_code[];
++asm ( ".balign 2\n"
++" . = . + 1\n"
++"misaligned_code:\n"
++" larl %r0,0\n"
++" bcr 0xf,%r1\n"
++);
++
+static int psw_odd_address(void)
+{
-+ struct psw odd = {
-+ .mask = extract_psw_mask(),
-+ };
-+ uint64_t regs[16];
-+ int r;
++ struct psw odd = PSW_WITH_CUR_MASK((uint64_t)&misaligned_code);
++ uint64_t executed_addr;
+
-+ /*
-+ * This asm is reentered at an odd address, which should cause a specification
-+ * exception before the first unaligned instruction is executed.
-+ * In this case, the interrupt handler fixes the address and the test succeeds.
-+ * If, however, unaligned instructions *are* executed, they are jumped to
-+ * from somewhere, with unknown registers, so save and restore those before.
-+ */
-+ asm volatile ( "stmg %%r0,%%r15,%[regs]\n"
-+ //can only offset by even number when using larl -> increment by one
-+ " larl %[r],0f\n"
-+ " aghi %[r],1\n"
-+ " stg %[r],%[addr]\n"
-+ " xr %[r],%[r]\n"
-+ " brc 0xf,1f\n"
-+ "0: . = . + 1\n"
-+ " lmg %%r0,%%r15,0(%%r1)\n"
-+ //address of the instruction itself, should be odd, store for assert
-+ " larl %[r],0\n"
-+ " stg %[r],%[addr]\n"
-+ " larl %[r],0f\n"
-+ " aghi %[r],1\n"
-+ " bcr 0xf,%[r]\n"
-+ "0: . = . + 1\n"
-+ "1:\n"
-+ : [addr] "=T" (odd.addr),
-+ [regs] "=Q" (regs),
-+ [r] "=d" (r)
-+ : : "cc", "memory"
++ expect_invalid_psw(odd);
++ fixup_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
++ asm volatile ( "xr %%r0,%%r0\n"
++ " larl %%r1,0f\n"
++ " stg %%r1,%[fixup_addr]\n"
++ " lpswe %[odd_psw]\n"
++ "0: lr %[executed_addr],%%r0\n"
++ : [fixup_addr] "=&T" (fixup_psw.addr),
++ [executed_addr] "=d" (executed_addr)
++ : [odd_psw] "Q" (odd)
++ : "cc", "%r0", "%r1"
+ );
+
-+ if (!r) {
-+ expect_invalid_psw(odd);
-+ load_psw_with_arg(odd, (uint64_t)®s);
++ if (!executed_addr) {
+ return check_invalid_psw();
+ } else {
-+ assert(odd.addr & 1);
++ assert(executed_addr == odd.addr);
+ clear_invalid_psw();
-+ report_fail("executed unaligned instructions");
++ report_fail("did not execute unaligned instructions");
+ return 1;
+ }
+}
2: 30075863 ! 3: dc552880 s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address
@@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static int short_psw_bit_12_is_0(void)
+static int odd_ex_target(void)
+{
-+ uint64_t target_addr_pre;
++ uint64_t pre_target_addr;
+ int to = 0, from = 0x0dd;
+
+ asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
-+ "odd_ex_target_pre_insn:\n"
-+ " .balign 2\n"
++ "pre_odd_ex_target:\n"
++ " .balign 2\n"
+ " . = . + 1\n"
+ " lr %[to],%[from]\n"
+ " .popsection\n"
+
-+ " larl %[target_addr_pre],odd_ex_target_pre_insn\n"
-+ " ex 0,1(%[target_addr_pre])\n"
-+ : [target_addr_pre] "=&a" (target_addr_pre),
++ " larl %[pre_target_addr],pre_odd_ex_target\n"
++ " ex 0,1(%[pre_target_addr])\n"
++ : [pre_target_addr] "=&a" (pre_target_addr),
+ [to] "+d" (to)
+ : [from] "d" (from)
+ );
+
-+ assert((target_addr_pre + 1) & 1);
++ assert((pre_target_addr + 1) & 1);
+ report(to != from, "did not perform ex with odd target");
+ return 0;
+}
base-commit: e3c5c3ef2524c58023073c0fadde2e8ae3c04ec6
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-21 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230221174822.1378667-1-nsg@linux.ibm.com>
2023-02-21 17:48 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/3] s390x/spec_ex: Use PSW macro Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-21 17:50 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2023-02-23 10:09 ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-21 17:48 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test introducing odd address into PSW Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-03-14 15:21 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-03-15 13:48 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-21 17:48 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] s390x/spec_ex: Add test of EXECUTE with odd target address Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-03-14 15:25 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-03-14 16:41 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-03-14 17:12 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-03-14 17:59 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a9740faae7f375248c60ff5b0753cadc9ed0348.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox