From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_map_unmap VM test case
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 11:08:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b323867-a2f8-4bae-9f33-02ecf8362a13@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240730072413.143556-8-schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
On 7/30/24 9:24 AM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> Add a test case verifying basic running and interaction of ucontrol VMs.
> Fill the segment and page tables for allocated memory and map memory on
> first access.
>
> * uc_map_unmap
> Store and load data to mapped and unmapped memory and use pic segment
> translation handling to map memory on access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 165 +++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 164 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> index 817b1e08559c..b7f760f980fd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,13 @@
> #include <linux/capability.h>
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
>
> +#define UC_PIC_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION 0x10
That's a bit clearer and used by KVM:
#define PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION 0x10
> +
> #define VM_MEM_SIZE (4 * SZ_1M)
> +#define VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE (2 * SZ_1M)
> +#define VM_MEM_MAX (VM_MEM_SIZE + VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE)
> +
[...]
> + self->pgd = self->base_gpa + SZ_1M; /* set PASCE addr */
Please put the comments on the line above
> + phd = gpa2hva(self, self->pgd);
> + memset(phd, 0xff, PAGES_PER_SEGMENT * PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + for (si = 0; si < ((VM_MEM_SIZE + VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE) / SZ_1M); si++) {
> + /* create ste */
> + phd[si] = (self->pgd
> + + (PAGES_PER_SEGMENT * PAGE_SIZE
> + * ((VM_MEM_SIZE + VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE) / SZ_1M))
> + + (PAGES_PER_SEGMENT * PAGE_SIZE * si)) & ~0x7fful;
> + se_addr = gpa2hva(self, phd[si]);
> + memset(se_addr, 0xff, PAGES_PER_SEGMENT * PAGE_SIZE);
> + for (pi = 0; pi < (SZ_1M / PAGE_SIZE); pi++) {
> + /* create pte */
> + ((u64 *)se_addr)[pi] = (self->base_gpa
> + + (si * SZ_1M) + (pi * PAGE_SIZE)) & ~0xffful;
> + }
> + }
> + pr_debug("segment table entry %p (0x%lx) --> %p\n",
> + phd, phd[0], gpa2hva(self, (phd[0] & ~0x7fful)));
> + print_hex_bytes("st", (u64)phd, 64);
> + print_hex_bytes("pt", (u64)gpa2hva(self, phd[0]), 128);
> + print_hex_bytes("pt+", (u64)
> + gpa2hva(self, phd[0] + (PAGES_PER_SEGMENT * PAGE_SIZE
> + * ((VM_MEM_SIZE + VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE) / SZ_1M)) - 0x64), 128);
> +
> + sync_regs->crs[1] = self->pgd | 0x3; /* PASCE TT=00 for segment table */
Same here
> + run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_CRS;
> +}
> +
> +static void uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
> +{
> + struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
> + switch (run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code) {
> + case UC_PIC_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION:
> + pr_info("ucontrol pic segment translation 0x%llx\n",
> + run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code);
> + /* map / make additional memory available */
> + struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping map2 = {
> + .user_addr = (u64)gpa2hva(self, run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code),
> + .vcpu_addr = run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code,
> + .length = VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE,
> + };
> + pr_info("ucas map %p %p 0x%llx\n",
> + (void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP, &map2));
> + break;
> + default:
> + TEST_FAIL("UNEXPECTED PGM CODE %d", run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /* verify SIEIC exit
> * * reset stop requests
> * * fail on codes not expected in the test cases
> @@ -245,7 +338,11 @@ static bool uc_handle_sieic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
> break;
> case ICPT_INST:
> /* end execution in caller on intercepted instruction */
> + pr_info("sie instruction interception\n");
That should have been part of an earlier patch?
> return false;
> + case ICPT_OPEREXC:
> + /* operation exception */
> + TEST_FAIL("sie exception on %.4x%.8x", sie_block->ipa, sie_block->ipb);
> default:
> TEST_FAIL("UNEXPECTED SIEIC CODE %d", run->s390_sieic.icptcode);
> }
> @@ -258,6 +355,11 @@ static bool uc_handle_exit(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
> struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
>
> switch (run->exit_reason) {
> + case KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL:
> + /* check program interruption code */
> + /* handle page fault --> ucas map */
Multi-line comments do exist
> + uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(self);
> + break;
> case KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC:
> return uc_handle_sieic(self);
> default:
> @@ -289,6 +391,67 @@ static void uc_assert_diag44(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
> TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0x440000, sie_block->ipb);
> }
>
> +TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_map_unmap)
> +{
> + struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;
> + struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
> + int rc;
> +
> + init_st_pt(self);
> +
> + /* copy test_mem_asm to code_hva / code_gpa */
> + TH_LOG("copy code %p to vm mapped memory %p / %p",
> + &test_mem_asm, (void *)self->code_hva, (void *)self->code_gpa);
> + memcpy((void *)self->code_hva, &test_mem_asm, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + run->psw_mask = 0x0400000180000000ULL; /* DAT enabled + 64 bit mode */
> + run->psw_addr = self->code_gpa;
Please put the comments on the line above
> +
> + /* set register content for test_mem_asm to access not mapped memory*/
> + sync_regs->gprs[1] = 0x55;
> + sync_regs->gprs[5] = self->base_gpa;
> + sync_regs->gprs[6] = VM_MEM_SIZE;
> + run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
> +
> + /* run and expect to fail witch ucontrol pic segment translation */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
> + ASSERT_EQ(1, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> + ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(UC_PIC_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION, run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code);
> + ASSERT_EQ(self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE, run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code);
> + /* map / make additional memory available */
> + struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping map2 = {
> + .user_addr = (u64)gpa2hva(self, self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE),
> + .vcpu_addr = self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE,
> + .length = VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE,
> + };
> + TH_LOG("ucas map %p %p 0x%llx",
> + (void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
> + rc = ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP, &map2);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, rc)
> + TH_LOG("ucas map result %d not expected, %s", rc, strerror(errno));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
> + ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
> + uc_assert_diag44(self);
> +
> + /* assert registers and memory are in expected state */
> + ASSERT_EQ(2, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0x55, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0x55, *(u32 *)gpa2hva(self, self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE));
> +
> + /* unmap and run loop again */
> + TH_LOG("ucas unmap %p %p 0x%llx",
> + (void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
> + rc = ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP, &map2);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, rc)
> + TH_LOG("ucas map result %d not expected, %s", rc, strerror(errno));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
> + ASSERT_EQ(3, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> + ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
> + ASSERT_EQ(true, uc_handle_exit(self));
> +}
> +
> TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_gprs)
> {
> struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-30 7:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] selftests: kvm: s390: Add s390x ucontrol selftests Christoph Schlameuss
2024-07-30 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] selftests: kvm: s390: Define page sizes in shared header Christoph Schlameuss
2024-07-30 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] selftests: kvm: s390: Add kvm_s390_sie_block definition for userspace tests Christoph Schlameuss
2024-07-30 12:04 ` Janosch Frank
2024-07-30 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] selftests: kvm: s390: Add s390x ucontrol test suite with hpage test Christoph Schlameuss
2024-07-30 13:14 ` Janosch Frank
2024-07-30 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] selftests: kvm: s390: Add test fixture and simple VM setup tests Christoph Schlameuss
2024-07-30 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] selftests: kvm: s390: Add debug print functions Christoph Schlameuss
2024-08-01 8:44 ` Janosch Frank
2024-07-30 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] selftests: kvm: s390: Add VM run test case Christoph Schlameuss
2024-07-31 14:37 ` Janosch Frank
2024-08-01 7:05 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2024-07-30 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_map_unmap VM " Christoph Schlameuss
2024-08-01 9:08 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2024-08-01 15:06 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2024-07-30 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_skey " Christoph Schlameuss
2024-07-30 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] selftests: kvm: s390: Verify reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs Christoph Schlameuss
2024-08-01 9:11 ` Janosch Frank
2024-07-30 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] s390: Enable KVM_S390_UCONTROL config in debug_defconfig Christoph Schlameuss
2024-08-01 10:40 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b323867-a2f8-4bae-9f33-02ecf8362a13@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox