public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net/smc: Introduce receive queue flow control support
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 00:48:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b73df73-d5e8-32a8-1495-63596b256392@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YelwGOBhjBFsVPxA@TonyMac-Alibaba>

On 2022/1/20 22:22, Tony Lu wrote:>>  #include "smc_ib.h"
>>  
>> -#define SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX	255	/* max. # of RMBs per link group */
>> +#define SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX	32	/* max. # of RMBs per link group. Correspondingly,
>> +					 * SMC_WR_BUF_CNT should not be less than 2 *
>> +					 * SMC_RMBS_PER_LGR_MAX, since every connection at
>> +					 * least has two rq/sq credits in average, otherwise
>> +					 * may result in waiting for credits in sending process.
>> +					 */
> 
> This gives a fixed limit for per link group connections. Using tunable
> knobs to control this for different workload would be better. It also
> reduce the completion of free slots in the same link group and link.
> 

It is a good idea, but I find a patch (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/20220114054852.38058-7-tonylu@linux.alibaba.com/) where you have already done this idea.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-21 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-20  6:51 [RFC PATCH net-next] net/smc: Introduce receive queue flow control support Guangguan Wang
2022-01-20  8:24 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-01-20  9:20   ` Guangguan Wang
2022-01-20  9:51 ` dust.li
2022-01-21 16:21   ` Guangguan Wang
2022-01-20 11:03 ` Karsten Graul
2022-01-21 16:36   ` Guangguan Wang
2022-01-20 14:22 ` Tony Lu
2022-01-21 16:48   ` Guangguan Wang [this message]
2022-01-25  9:42 ` Stefan Raspl
2022-01-29  3:43   ` Guangguan Wang
2022-01-29  4:24     ` Tony Lu
2022-01-31 12:56     ` Karsten Graul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0b73df73-d5e8-32a8-1495-63596b256392@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox