From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] vfio-mdev: Wire in a request handler for mdev parent
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:12:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fead493-332e-ff0a-ffea-c3b162cfe347@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119165611.6a811d76.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
On 11/19/20 10:56 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:30:26 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> +static void vfio_mdev_request(void *device_data, unsigned int count)
>>> +{
>>> + struct mdev_device *mdev = device_data;
>>> + struct mdev_parent *parent = mdev->parent;
>>> +
>>> + if (unlikely(!parent->ops->request))
>> Hm. Do you think that all drivers should implement a ->request()
>> callback?
> @Tony: What do you think, does vfio_ap need something like this?
>
> BTW how is this supposed to work in a setup where the one parent
> has may children (like vfio_ap or the gpu slice and dice usecases).
>
> After giving this some thought I'm under the impression, I don't
> get the full picture yet.
Eric Farman touched base with me on Friday to discuss this, but
I was on my way out the door for an appointment. He is off this
week; so, the bottom line for me is that I don't have even a
piece of the picture here and therefore don't have enough
info to speculate on whether vfio_ap needs something like this.
>
> Regards,
> Halil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-23 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-17 3:21 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Connect request callback to mdev and vfio-ccw Eric Farman
2020-11-17 3:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] vfio-mdev: Wire in a request handler for mdev parent Eric Farman
2020-11-19 11:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-19 14:36 ` Eric Farman
2020-11-19 15:56 ` Halil Pasic
2020-11-20 11:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-23 19:12 ` Tony Krowiak [this message]
2020-11-19 16:27 ` Alex Williamson
2020-11-19 20:04 ` Eric Farman
2020-11-20 11:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-19 15:29 ` Halil Pasic
2020-11-17 3:21 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] vfio-ccw: Wire in the request callback Eric Farman
2020-11-19 11:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-19 12:00 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0fead493-332e-ff0a-ffea-c3b162cfe347@linux.ibm.com \
--to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox