public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Simplify the API
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 11:33:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1062182.1760956416@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251020005038.661542-12-ebiggers@kernel.org>

Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:

> Instead of having separate types and functions for each of the six SHA-3
> algorithms, instead divide them into two groups: the digests and the
> XOFs.  The digests use sha3_ctx and the XOFs use shake_ctx.  The
> internal context is now called __sha3_ctx.

Please roll changes into the original patches rather than posting them with a
set of "fixes" and add a Co-developed-by tag for yourself.  Or if you want
your authorship on your changes, just switch the Author to yourself and put a
note in the changelog noting that you modified it from what I posted.

> +/** Context for SHA3-224, SHA3-256, SHA3-384, or SHA3-512 */
> +struct sha3_ctx {
> +	struct __sha3_ctx	ctx;
> +	u8			digest_size;	/* Digest size in bytes */
> +};

Don't do that.  That expands the context by an extra word when there's spare
space in __sha3_ctx.  If you go with the separate types, then this field is
redundant.  Actually, I lean slightly towards passing in the desired digest
length to sha3_*final() and doing a WARN if it doesn't match.

> +static inline void sha3_zeroize_ctx(struct sha3_ctx *ctx)

sha3_zero_ctx() please if you don't like "sha3_clear_ctx".  "zero" is a
perfectly usable as verb in itself.

> +/** Zeroize a shake_ctx.  Call this after the last squeeze. */

/**
 * shake_zero_ctx - Clear a shake_ctx.
 * @ctx: The context to clear.
 * 
 * Clear the context for a shake XOF.  Call after the last squeeze.
 */

Something like this, please.

David


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-20 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-20  0:50 [PATCH 00/17] SHA-3 library Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 01/17] s390/sha3: Rename conflicting functions Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 02/17] arm64/sha3: " Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 03/17] lib/crypto: Add SHA3-224, SHA3-256, SHA3-384, SHA3-512, SHAKE128, SHAKE256 Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  7:07   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-10-20 10:39     ` David Howells
2025-10-20 23:54       ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 04/17] lib/crypto: Move the SHA3 Iota transform into the single round function Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 05/17] lib/crypto: Add SHA3 kunit tests Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 06/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Fix libsha3 build condition Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 07/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Use appropriate conversions in sha3_keccakf_generic() Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 08/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Drop unfinished SHAKE support from gen-hash-testvecs.py Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 09/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Consistently use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 10/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Replace redundant ad-hoc test with FIPS test Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 11/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Simplify the API Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 10:33   ` David Howells [this message]
2025-10-20 17:18     ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 12/17] lib/crypto: sha3: Document one-shot functions in header and improve docs Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 13/17] crypto: arm64/sha3 - Update sha3_ce_transform() to prepare for library Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 14/17] lib/crypto: arm64/sha3: Migrate optimized code into library Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 15/17] lib/crypto: s390/sha3: " Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 14:00   ` Holger Dengler
2025-10-20 14:23     ` Holger Dengler
2025-10-20 17:57     ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-21  7:24       ` Holger Dengler
2025-10-21  8:43         ` Holger Dengler
2025-10-21 15:49           ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-24 14:24             ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-10-24 16:11               ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 16/17] crypto: jitterentropy - use default sha3 implementation Eric Biggers
2025-10-20 10:35   ` David Howells
2025-10-20 21:20     ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-20  0:50 ` [PATCH 17/17] crypto: sha3 - Reimplement using library API Eric Biggers
2025-10-21  6:53   ` David Howells
2025-10-22 10:13 ` [PATCH 00/17] SHA-3 library Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1062182.1760956416@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox