From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com,
mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp,
horms@verge.net.au, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] kdump: Patch series for s390 support
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:06:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310396789.3557.43.camel@br98xy6r> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110711140754.GD30674@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 10:07 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > Hello Vivek,
> >
> > I attached a document where the s390 port is described in more detail.
> > Perhaps this helps you to understand what want and what we are doing. If
> > not - just delete it :-)
> >
>
> Michael,
>
> Thanks for the documentation. I have gone through it quickly and there
> are some parts I am still missing.
>
> On x86, after the kernel crash we jump to purgatory code which does the
> checksum verification of all the loaded segments and if everything is
> fine, it jumps to kdump kernel's entry point and second kernel boots.
>
> On s390, looks like after purgatory, control is going to some other
> piece of code (which does IPL?), and that code decides whether to
> start kdump kernel or launch stand alone kernel as backup plan?
>
> If yes, is that code whic does the IPL, also loaded in crashkernel memory
> as part of kdump kernel? If not, how does kexec-tools come to know
> where to jump after doing checksum on loaded kernel?
On s390 currently we currently do not use the purgatory kexec-tools code
at all. Therefore this checksum check is not done.
We have defined a new kernel entry point for kdump at <crashk base> +
0x10008. When this entry point is used, the first instructions swap the
area [0, crashk size] with [crashk base, crashk base + crashk size]. The
information about crashk base and size is taken from meminfo. After the
swap the Linux kernel is started with the information that we are in
kdump mode and the information about crashk base and size (which is
oldmem base and size now).
There are different ways how the kdump entry point can be called on s390
depending on the setting (/sys/firmware) for "panic" and
"restart" (something like NMI on intel). If you do not want the more
reliable two stage approach with the stand-alone dump tools, it is also
possible that the entry point is called directly via machine_kexec(). In
this case the crashed kernel does the s390 specific checksum test and
then jumps to <crashk base> + 0x10008.
The more reliable solution with our stand-alone dump tools works as
follows:
1. Stand-alone dump disk or tape is IPLed (booted). This can be done
either automatically via the panic() kernel code path or manually by the
operator of the (virtual) machine.
2. The stand-alone dump tool (mini OS) is loaded to 0x2000 under
0x10000. This area is always free and is not used by Linux on s390.
3. The stand-alone dump tool finds the crashkernel memory via meminfo
that can be found via a pointer at address 0xe14.
4. The stand-alone verifies the kdump checksums and jumps to <crashk
base> + 0x10008, if everything is ok.
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-04 17:09 [patch 0/9] kdump: Patch series for s390 support Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 1/9] kdump: Add KEXEC_CRASH_CONTROL_MEMORY_LIMIT Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 2/9] kdump: Add machine_kexec_finish() Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 3/9] kdump: Make kimage_load_crash_segment() weak Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 4/9] kdump: Initialize vmcoreinfo note at startup Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 5/9] kdump: Allow vmcore ELF header to be created in new kernel Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 6/9] kdump: Merge set_vmcore_list_offsets_elf_32/64() Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 7/9] kdump: Trigger kdump via panic notifier chain on s390 Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 8/9] s390: kdump backend code Michael Holzheu
2011-07-04 17:09 ` [patch 9/9] kexec-tools: Add s390 kdump support Michael Holzheu
2011-07-05 20:26 ` [patch 0/9] kdump: Patch series for s390 support Vivek Goyal
2011-07-06 9:24 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-07 19:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-08 9:01 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-11 14:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-11 15:56 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-13 16:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-13 16:46 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-13 16:59 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-13 17:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-13 20:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-14 7:18 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-14 17:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-14 18:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-15 14:21 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-15 14:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-15 15:43 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-18 12:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 14:00 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-18 14:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 14:44 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-18 15:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 18:03 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-19 15:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-20 8:00 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-20 9:28 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-20 20:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-20 19:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-21 14:58 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-21 21:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-22 9:33 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-25 16:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-26 9:44 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-22 15:26 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-25 18:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-26 9:32 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-15 13:56 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-15 14:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-18 13:57 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-07-08 13:04 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-11 15:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-12 17:29 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-08 14:02 ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-11 14:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-11 15:06 ` Michael Holzheu [this message]
2011-07-09 17:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-07-12 13:52 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310396789.3557.43.camel@br98xy6r \
--to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox