public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Martin Peschke <mpeschke@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] zfcp: remove access control tables interface (port leftovers)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:59:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415887188-40233-2-git-send-email-maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415887188-40233-1-git-send-email-maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: Martin Peschke <mpeschke@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This patch removes some leftovers for commit
663e0890e31cb85f0cca5ac1faaee0d2d52880b5
"[SCSI] zfcp: remove access control tables interface".

The "access denied" case for ports is gone, as well.
The corresponding flag was cleared, but never set.
So clean it up.

Sysfs flag is kept, though, for backward-compatibility.
Now it returns always 0.

Signed-off-by: Martin Peschke <mpeschke@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c   | 7 -------
 drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c   | 3 +--
 drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c | 4 +---
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
index c82fe65..2c5d456 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
@@ -821,11 +821,6 @@ static int zfcp_erp_port_forced_strategy_close(struct zfcp_erp_action *act)
 	return ZFCP_ERP_CONTINUES;
 }
 
-static void zfcp_erp_port_strategy_clearstati(struct zfcp_port *port)
-{
-	atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ACCESS_DENIED, &port->status);
-}
-
 static int zfcp_erp_port_forced_strategy(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action)
 {
 	struct zfcp_port *port = erp_action->port;
@@ -833,7 +828,6 @@ static int zfcp_erp_port_forced_strategy(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action)
 
 	switch (erp_action->step) {
 	case ZFCP_ERP_STEP_UNINITIALIZED:
-		zfcp_erp_port_strategy_clearstati(port);
 		if ((status & ZFCP_STATUS_PORT_PHYS_OPEN) &&
 		    (status & ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_OPEN))
 			return zfcp_erp_port_forced_strategy_close(erp_action);
@@ -933,7 +927,6 @@ static int zfcp_erp_port_strategy(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action)
 
 	switch (erp_action->step) {
 	case ZFCP_ERP_STEP_UNINITIALIZED:
-		zfcp_erp_port_strategy_clearstati(port);
 		if (p_status & ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_OPEN)
 			return zfcp_erp_port_strategy_close(erp_action);
 		break;
diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
index 0fe8d5d..21ec5e2 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
@@ -1396,8 +1396,7 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_open_port_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
 		port->handle = header->port_handle;
 		atomic_set_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_OPEN |
 				ZFCP_STATUS_PORT_PHYS_OPEN, &port->status);
-		atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ACCESS_DENIED |
-		                  ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ACCESS_BOXED,
+		atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ACCESS_BOXED,
 		                  &port->status);
 		/* check whether D_ID has changed during open */
 		/*
diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
index 672b572..6b66412 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
@@ -73,9 +73,7 @@ ZFCP_DEFINE_ATTR(zfcp_port, port, status, "0x%08x\n",
 ZFCP_DEFINE_ATTR(zfcp_port, port, in_recovery, "%d\n",
 		 (atomic_read(&port->status) &
 		  ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ERP_INUSE) != 0);
-ZFCP_DEFINE_ATTR(zfcp_port, port, access_denied, "%d\n",
-		 (atomic_read(&port->status) &
-		  ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ACCESS_DENIED) != 0);
+ZFCP_DEFINE_ATTR_CONST(port, access_denied, "%d\n", 0);
 
 ZFCP_DEFINE_ATTR(zfcp_unit, unit, status, "0x%08x\n",
 		 zfcp_unit_sdev_status(unit));
-- 
1.8.5.5

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-13 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-13 13:59 [PATCH 0/3] zfcp features for 3.19 Steffen Maier
2014-11-13 13:59 ` Steffen Maier [this message]
2014-11-17 13:29   ` [PATCH 1/3] zfcp: remove access control tables interface (port leftovers) Hannes Reinecke
2014-11-17 13:33     ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-11-13 13:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] zfcp: bring back unit sysfs attributes for automatic LUN scan Steffen Maier
2014-11-17 13:34   ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-11-13 13:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] zfcp: auto port scan resiliency Steffen Maier
2014-11-17 13:37   ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-11-20 15:52 ` [PATCH 0/3] zfcp features for 3.19 Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1415887188-40233-2-git-send-email-maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpeschke@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox