public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tobias Huschle <huschle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	vschneid@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: introduce new scheduler group type group_parked
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:13:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15851309-1c3b-4506-b094-fd445941f142@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f3b49cb-15bc-43ef-b4cb-3af98c8a1c5f@linux.ibm.com>



On 10/12/2024 21:24, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> On 12/9/24 13:35, Tobias Huschle wrote:
[...]
> 
> It was happening with 100% stress-ng case. I was wondering since i dont 
> have no-hz full enabled.
> I found out the reason why and one way to do is to trigger active load 
> balance if there are any parked cpus
> in the group. That probably needs a IS_ENABLED check not to hurt the 
> regular case.
> 
> Also, I gave a try to include arch_cpu_parked in idle_cpu and friends. 
> It seems to working for me.
> I will attach the code below. It simplifies code quite a bit.
> 
> Also, I am thinking to rely on active balance codepath more than the 
> regular pull model.
> so this would be akin to asym packing codepaths. The below code does 
> that too.
> 
> Feel free to take the bits as necessary if it works.
> 

Thanks a lot for your your comments and proposals. I was working through 
them and have a v2 almost ready. I'll be offline for the next 4 weeks 
though and will post my v2 once I'm back.


[...]


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-14 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-04 11:21 [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: introduce new scheduler group type group_parked Tobias Huschle
2024-12-04 11:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] " Tobias Huschle
2024-12-05 18:04   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-09  8:17     ` Tobias Huschle
2024-12-04 11:21 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] s390/topology: Add initial implementation for selection of parked CPUs Tobias Huschle
2024-12-05 18:12   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-09  8:18     ` Tobias Huschle
2024-12-05 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: introduce new scheduler group type group_parked Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-09  8:05   ` Tobias Huschle
2024-12-10 20:24     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-16 16:13       ` Tobias Huschle
2025-01-14 18:13       ` Tobias Huschle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15851309-1c3b-4506-b094-fd445941f142@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox