From: Tobias Huschle <huschle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: introduce new scheduler group type group_parked
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:13:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15851309-1c3b-4506-b094-fd445941f142@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f3b49cb-15bc-43ef-b4cb-3af98c8a1c5f@linux.ibm.com>
On 10/12/2024 21:24, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> On 12/9/24 13:35, Tobias Huschle wrote:
[...]
>
> It was happening with 100% stress-ng case. I was wondering since i dont
> have no-hz full enabled.
> I found out the reason why and one way to do is to trigger active load
> balance if there are any parked cpus
> in the group. That probably needs a IS_ENABLED check not to hurt the
> regular case.
>
> Also, I gave a try to include arch_cpu_parked in idle_cpu and friends.
> It seems to working for me.
> I will attach the code below. It simplifies code quite a bit.
>
> Also, I am thinking to rely on active balance codepath more than the
> regular pull model.
> so this would be akin to asym packing codepaths. The below code does
> that too.
>
> Feel free to take the bits as necessary if it works.
>
Thanks a lot for your your comments and proposals. I was working through
them and have a v2 almost ready. I'll be offline for the next 4 weeks
though and will post my v2 once I'm back.
[...]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-04 11:21 [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: introduce new scheduler group type group_parked Tobias Huschle
2024-12-04 11:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] " Tobias Huschle
2024-12-05 18:04 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-09 8:17 ` Tobias Huschle
2024-12-04 11:21 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] s390/topology: Add initial implementation for selection of parked CPUs Tobias Huschle
2024-12-05 18:12 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-09 8:18 ` Tobias Huschle
2024-12-05 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: introduce new scheduler group type group_parked Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-09 8:05 ` Tobias Huschle
2024-12-10 20:24 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-12-16 16:13 ` Tobias Huschle
2025-01-14 18:13 ` Tobias Huschle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15851309-1c3b-4506-b094-fd445941f142@linux.ibm.com \
--to=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox