From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 16:52:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e51b893-dc1e-1740-f286-ec00195d6a7f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e03cb81c-30cc-7cbc-c3a8-cc863a5d0be1@linux.ibm.com>
On 08/06/2020 16.33, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-06-08 10:43, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 08/06/2020 10.12, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> This patch defines the PSW bits EA/BA used to initialize the PSW masks
>>> for exceptions.
>>>
>>> Since some PSW mask definitions exist already in arch_def.h we add these
>>> definitions there.
>>> We move all PSW definitions together and protect assembler code against
>>> C syntax.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 15 +++++++++++----
>>> s390x/cstart64.S | 15 ++++++++-------
>>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>>> index 1b3bb0c..5388114 100644
>>> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>>> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>>> @@ -10,15 +10,21 @@
>>> #ifndef _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
>>> #define _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
>>> +#define PSW_MASK_EXT 0x0100000000000000UL
>>> +#define PSW_MASK_DAT 0x0400000000000000UL
>>> +#define PSW_MASK_SHORT_PSW 0x0008000000000000UL
>>> +#define PSW_MASK_PSTATE 0x0001000000000000UL
>>> +#define PSW_MASK_BA 0x0000000080000000UL
>>> +#define PSW_MASK_EA 0x0000000100000000UL
>>> +
>>> +#define PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK (PSW_MASK_EA | PSW_MASK_BA)
>>
>> PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK sounds a little bit unfortunate - that term rather
>> reminds me of something that disables some interrupts
>> ... in case you
>> respin, maybe rather use something like "PSW_EXC_ADDR_MODE" ?
>
> EXCEPTIONS_PSW_MASK ?
I think it is the _MASK suffix that mainly bugs me here, since this is
not a define that you normally use for extracting the bits from a PSW...
so EXCEPTIONS_PSW without _MASK would be fine for me... but as long as
I'm the only one who has a strange feeling about this, it's also ok if
you keep the current name.
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-08 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-08 8:12 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 00/12] s390x: Testing the Channel Subsystem I/O Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:43 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-08 14:33 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 14:52 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2020-06-08 15:28 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 15:30 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-08 8:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 02/12] s390x: Move control register bit definitions and add AFP to them Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:45 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-08 14:25 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 03/12] s390x: saving regs for interrupts Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 9:05 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-08 14:24 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 15:29 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-08 16:03 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 04/12] s390x: interrupt registration Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 05/12] s390x: export the clock get_clock_ms() utility Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 06/12] s390x: clock and delays caluculations Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 15:55 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-08 16:16 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 07/12] s390x: define function to wait for interrupt Pierre Morel
2020-06-09 5:07 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-09 7:54 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 08/12] s390x: retrieve decimal and hexadecimal kernel parameters Pierre Morel
2020-06-09 5:21 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-09 7:53 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 09/12] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests Pierre Morel
2020-06-09 7:09 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-09 15:01 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-10 14:51 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-10 15:10 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 10/12] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test Pierre Morel
2020-06-09 7:39 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-09 12:20 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-10 15:54 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-06-08 8:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 11/12] s390x: css: msch, enable test Pierre Morel
2020-06-09 7:47 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-09 7:56 ` Pierre Morel
2020-06-08 8:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 12/12] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt Pierre Morel
2020-06-09 8:15 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-09 12:02 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e51b893-dc1e-1740-f286-ec00195d6a7f@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox