From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux390@de.ibm.com, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Kernel build fails on S390x
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 23:19:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071205231904.3dc4d130.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47576959.4040706@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 08:45:37 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails on s390x,
>
> CC arch/s390/kernel/traps.o
> In file included from include/asm/thread_info.h:39,
> from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
> from include/linux/preempt.h:9,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
> from include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
> from include/linux/time.h:8,
> from include/linux/timex.h:57,
> from include/linux/sched.h:53,
> from arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:17:
> include/asm/processor.h:191: warning: "struct seq_file" declared inside parameter list
> include/asm/processor.h:191: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> arch/s390/kernel/traps.c: In function `task_show_regs':
> arch/s390/kernel/traps.c:226: error: implicit declaration of function `seq_printf'
> make[1]: *** [arch/s390/kernel/traps.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/s390/kernel] Error 2
thanks.
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c~proc-seqfile-convert-proc_pid_status-to-properly-handle-pid-namespaces-fix-2
+++ a/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kdebug.h>
diff -puN include/asm-s390/processor.h~proc-seqfile-convert-proc_pid_status-to-properly-handle-pid-namespaces-fix-2 include/asm-s390/processor.h
--- a/include/asm-s390/processor.h~proc-seqfile-convert-proc_pid_status-to-properly-handle-pid-namespaces-fix-2
+++ a/include/asm-s390/processor.h
@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ struct stack_frame {
/* Forward declaration, a strange C thing */
struct task_struct;
struct mm_struct;
+struct seq_file;
/* Free all resources held by a thread. */
extern void release_thread(struct task_struct *);
_
Unfortunately the current greg-versus-git-s390 snafu means that I'm not
cross-building s390.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-06 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20071204211701.994dfce6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-12-06 3:15 ` 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 Kernel build fails on S390x Kamalesh Babulal
2007-12-06 7:19 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071205231904.3dc4d130.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox