From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/10] clocksource: Remove "weak" from clocksource_default_clock() declaration
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:45:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141016154522.1d660793@mschwide> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo6timzQ7YDj=SMyCT=g4tgb5i4zua4OUYsYcg8Ur-J-SQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:40:16 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Martin Schwidefsky
> <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:30:33 -0600
> > Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> >
> >> [+cc Daniel, Martin, linux-s390; sorry, I botched my "stg mail" so you
> >> weren't included the first time. s390 could see issues from this.]
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> >> > kernel/time/jiffies.c provides a default clocksource_default_clock()
> >> > definition explicitly marked "weak". arch/s390 provides its own definition
> >> > intended to override the default, but the "weak" attribute on the
> >> > declaration applied to the s390 definition as well, so the linker chose one
> >> > based on link order (see 10629d711ed7 ("PCI: Remove __weak annotation from
> >> > pcibios_get_phb_of_node decl")).
> >> >
> >> > Remove the "weak" attribute from the clocksource_default_clock()
> >> > declaration so we always prefer a non-weak definition over the weak one,
> >> > independent of link order.
> >> >
> >> > Fixes: f1b82746c1e9 ("clocksource: Cleanup clocksource selection")
> >> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >> > CC: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> >> > CC: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > include/linux/clocksource.h | 2 +-
> >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/clocksource.h b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> >> > index 653f0e2b6ca9..abcafaa20b86 100644
> >> > --- a/include/linux/clocksource.h
> >> > +++ b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> >> > @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ extern struct clocksource* clocksource_get_next(void);
> >> > extern void clocksource_change_rating(struct clocksource *cs, int rating);
> >> > extern void clocksource_suspend(void);
> >> > extern void clocksource_resume(void);
> >> > -extern struct clocksource * __init __weak clocksource_default_clock(void);
> >> > +extern struct clocksource * __init clocksource_default_clock(void);
> >> > extern void clocksource_mark_unstable(struct clocksource *cs);
> >> >
> >> > extern u64
> >> >
> >
> > s390 compiles and boots without the __weak for clocksource_default_clock.
>
> I assume this means you've tested this patch and s390 compiles and boots?
Correct.
> I assume you *don't* mean that s390 could drop its
> clocksource_default_clock() implementation and use the generic one,
> right?
Sorry, but I want to keep the s390 TOD clock as default.
The jiffies clock is not precise enough, even if it is used only at the beginning.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-16 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20141015165957.4063.66741.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
[not found] ` <20141015170624.4063.24678.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
2014-10-15 23:30 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] clocksource: Remove "weak" from clocksource_default_clock() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 7:22 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-16 13:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 13:45 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
[not found] ` <20141015170644.4063.6843.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
2014-10-15 23:38 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] memory-hotplug: Remove "weak" from memory_block_size_bytes() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 7:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
[not found] ` <20141015170631.4063.50854.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
[not found] ` <CAErSpo7zzofNsoGHuzfgfSEODyfkRs2FmyU-r3GjGDnNUF_0gw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-15 23:44 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] vmcore: Remove "weak" from function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 7:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-16 20:11 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141016154522.1d660793@mschwide \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox