public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>,
	Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>,
	nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Stefan Haberland <stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com>,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: export blkdev_reread_part()
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 09:12:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150405161241.GB16886@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428218688-4092-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>

> +/*
> + * This is exported as API for block driver, can be called
> + * with requiring bd_mutex or not.
> + */
> +int __blkdev_reread_part(struct block_device *bdev, bool lock)
>  {
>  	struct gendisk *disk = bdev->bd_disk;
>  	int res;
> @@ -159,12 +163,14 @@ static int blkdev_reread_part(struct block_device *bdev)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>  		return -EACCES;
> -	if (!mutex_trylock(&bdev->bd_mutex))
> +	if (lock && !mutex_trylock(&bdev->bd_mutex))
>  		return -EBUSY;

Please don't add funtions that do conditional locking, instead move
all the code into blkdev_reread_part_nolock, and then wrap it:

int blkdev_reread_part(struct block_device *bdev)
{
	if (!mutex_trylock(&bdev->bd_mutex))
		return -EBUSY;
	blkdev_reread_part_nolock(bdev);
	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
}

Please also add a lockdep_assert_held to blkdev_reread_part_nolock to
ensure callers actually do hold the lock.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-05 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-05  7:24 [PATCH 0/6] block: reread partitions changes and fix for loop Ming Lei
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: export blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-05 16:12   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-04-05 16:40     ` Ming Lei
2015-04-06 13:42       ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-06 13:48         ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-07  2:43         ` Ming Lei
2015-04-06 14:50       ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-07  2:11         ` Ming Lei
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: loop: don't hold lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open Ming Lei
2015-04-05 16:28   ` Ming Lei
2015-04-06 14:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: loop: fix another reread part failure Ming Lei
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: nbd: convert to blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: dasd_genhd: convert to blkdev_reread_part Ming Lei
2015-04-06 13:46   ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-06 13:51     ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-07  1:59       ` Ming Lei
2015-04-07  0:47     ` Ming Lei
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] block: replace trylock with mutex_lock in __blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-08  6:23 ` [PATCH 0/7] block: reread partitions improvements Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 1/7] block: export blkdev_reread_part() and __blkdev_reread_part() Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08 14:50     ` Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-08 15:27         ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08 15:28         ` Ming Lei
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 2/7] block: loop: don't hold lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:50     ` Ming Lei
2015-04-08 13:40       ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08 14:00         ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08 14:20           ` Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:28             ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 3/7] block: loop: fix another reread part failure Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 4/7] block: nbd: convert to blkdev_reread_part() Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 5/7] block: dasd_genhd: convert to blkdev_reread_part Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 6/7] block: replace trylock with mutex_lock in blkdev_reread_part() Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 7/7] s390/block/dasd: remove obsolete while -EBUSY loop Jarod Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150405161241.GB16886@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabf@skynet.be \
    --cc=jarod@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=mpa@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox