public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	renxiaof@linux.vnet.ibm.com, wkywang@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, agraf@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 08/12] vfio/ccw: get io region info
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:49:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117154934.568c6ea3@t450s.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170112072513.98411-9-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:25:09 +0100
Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> vfio-ccw provides an MMIO region for I/O operations. We fetch its
> information via ioctls here, then we can use it performing I/O
> instructions and retrieving I/O results later on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Feng Ren <renxiaof@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/vfio/ccw.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> index 881010b..93394c2 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> @@ -21,11 +21,15 @@
>  #include "hw/vfio/vfio-common.h"
>  #include "hw/s390x/s390-ccw.h"
>  #include "hw/s390x/ccw-device.h"
> +#include "standard-headers/asm-s390/vfio_ccw.h"
>  
>  #define TYPE_VFIO_CCW "vfio-ccw"
>  typedef struct VFIOCCWDevice {
>      S390CCWDevice cdev;
>      VFIODevice vdev;
> +    uint64_t io_region_size;
> +    uint64_t io_region_offset;
> +    struct ccw_io_region *io_region;
>  } VFIOCCWDevice;
>  
>  static void vfio_ccw_compute_needs_reset(VFIODevice *vdev)
> @@ -50,6 +54,46 @@ static void vfio_ccw_reset(DeviceState *dev)
>      ioctl(vcdev->vdev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_RESET);
>  }
>  
> +static void vfio_ccw_get_region(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    VFIODevice *vdev = &vcdev->vdev;
> +    struct vfio_region_info *info;
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    /* Sanity check device */
> +    if (!(vdev->flags & VFIO_DEVICE_FLAGS_CCW)) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "vfio: Um, this isn't a vfio-ccw device");
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (vdev->num_regions != VFIO_CCW_NUM_REGIONS) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "vfio: Unexpected number of the I/O region %u",
> +                   vdev->num_regions);
> +        return;
> +    }

I think you want < here, not !=, otherwise you we can never add another
region to describe something new on a vfio-ccw device without breaking
this code.  You've defined in the uapi that region index zero is always
VFIO_CCW_CONFIG_REGION_INDEX and this code only depends on that, no
matter what additional regions might be added.  That's done below.

> +
> +    ret = vfio_get_region_info(vdev, VFIO_CCW_CONFIG_REGION_INDEX, &info);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "vfio: Error getting config info: %d", ret);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    vcdev->io_region_size = info->size;
> +    if (sizeof(*vcdev->io_region) != vcdev->io_region_size) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "vfio: Unexpected size of the I/O region");
> +        return;
> +    }
> +    vcdev->io_region_offset = info->offset;
> +    vcdev->io_region = g_malloc0(info->size);
> +
> +    g_free(info);
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_ccw_put_region(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev)
> +{
> +    g_free(vcdev->io_region);
> +}
> +
>  static void vfio_put_device(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev)
>  {
>      g_free(vcdev->vdev.name);
> @@ -144,8 +188,15 @@ static void vfio_ccw_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>          goto out_device_err;
>      }
>  
> +    vfio_ccw_get_region(vcdev, errp);
> +    if (*errp) {
> +        goto out_region_err;
> +    }
> +
>      return;
>  
> +out_region_err:
> +    vfio_put_device(vcdev);
>  out_device_err:
>      vfio_ccw_put_group(group, path);
>  out_group_err:
> @@ -166,6 +217,7 @@ static void vfio_ccw_unrealize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>          cdc->unrealize(cdev, errp);
>      }
>  
> +    vfio_ccw_put_region(vcdev);
>      vfio_put_device(vcdev);
>      vfio_put_group(group);
>  }

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-17 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-12  7:25 [PATCH RFC v2 00/12] basic channel IO passthrough infrastructure based on vfio Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/12] update-linux-headers: add asm-s390/vfio_ccw.h Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/12] vfio: linux-headers update for vfio-ccw Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-17 21:51   ` Alex Williamson
2017-01-18  2:51     ` Dong Jia Shi
     [not found]     ` <20170118025117.GN30301@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-01-18 12:41       ` Cornelia Huck
2017-01-18 20:43         ` Alex Williamson
2017-01-19  1:54           ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/12] s390x/css: add s390-map-css machine option Dong Jia Shi
2017-02-17  2:08   ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/12] s390x/css: realize css_sch_build_schib Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/12] s390x/css: realize css_create_sch Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/12] s390x/css: device support for s390-ccw passthrough Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/12] vfio/ccw: vfio based subchannel passthrough driver Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-17 22:49   ` Alex Williamson
2017-01-18  3:22     ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/12] vfio/ccw: get io region info Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-17 22:49   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2017-01-18  5:22     ` Dong Jia Shi
     [not found]     ` <20170118052256.GP30301@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-01-18  5:51       ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/12] vfio/ccw: get irqs info and set the eventfd fd Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-17 22:53   ` Alex Williamson
2017-01-18  5:55     ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/12] s390x/css: introduce and realize ccw-request callback Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/12] s390x/css: ccws translation infrastructure Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  7:25 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/12] vfio/ccw: update sense data if a unit check is pending Dong Jia Shi
2017-01-12  8:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 00/12] basic channel IO passthrough infrastructure based on vfio no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170117154934.568c6ea3@t450s.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.com \
    --cc=bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=renxiaof@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=wkywang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox