From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: s390: mark irq_state.flags as non-usable
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:32:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171121163243.3f8cf5fc.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <638982df-e3a1-16d4-51a2-5a400075ac3d@redhat.com>
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:18:53 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 21.11.2017 16:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Old kernels did not check for zero in the irq_state.flags field and old
> > QEMUs did not zero the flag field when calling KVM_S390_*_IRQ_STATE.
> > Let's add a comment and dummy code to prevent future usage of flags
> > and pad.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> > index 6a5e02f..1baa393 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> > @@ -3834,6 +3834,16 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> > r = -EINVAL;
> > break;
> > }
> > + if (irq_state.flags) {
>
> I don't see the need for if (do I need more coffee?).
I think the if can be dropped and flags zeroed unconditionally, as we
can't do anything special for flags != 0 anyway.
>
> > + /*
> > + * This is a placeholder to make sure that nobody uses
> > + * flags and pad. Old kernels did not check for zero
> > + * and old QEMUs did not zero the flag field.
> > + * That means that we cannot use the flags field for
> > + * any possible extension.
> > + */
> > + irq_state.flags = 0;
> > + }
> > r = kvm_s390_set_irq_state(vcpu,
> > (void __user *) irq_state.buf,
> > irq_state.len);
> > @@ -3849,6 +3859,10 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> > r = -EINVAL;
> > break;
> > }
> > + if (irq_state.flags) {
>
> dito
>
> > + /* see above */
>
> /* same handling as for kvm_s390_set_irq_state() */
I like that comment better.
>
> > + irq_state.flags = 0;
> > + }
> > r = kvm_s390_get_irq_state(vcpu,
> > (__u8 __user *) irq_state.buf,
> > irq_state.len);
> >
>
>
We should also document this in Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt, I
think.
(Checking, the documentation for set_irq_state also seems wrong.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-21 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-21 15:08 [PATCH 1/1] KVM: s390: mark irq_state.flags as non-usable Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-21 15:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-21 15:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-11-21 15:32 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-11-21 17:42 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-11-21 18:27 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171121163243.3f8cf5fc.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox