public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, raspl@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/6] net/smc: do not reuse a linkgroup with setup problems
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:15:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180125101536.15727-5-ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180125101536.15727-1-ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Once a linkgroup is created successfully, it stays alive for a
certain time to service more connections potentially created.
If one of the initialization steps for a new linkgroup fails,
the linkgroup should not be reused by other connections following.

Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c   | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 net/smc/smc_core.c |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 05cbcd3a6f60..cf0e11978b66 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -377,6 +377,15 @@ static void smc_link_save_peer_info(struct smc_link *link,
 	link->peer_mtu = clc->qp_mtu;
 }
 
+static void smc_lgr_forget(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
+{
+	spin_lock_bh(&smc_lgr_list.lock);
+	/* do not use this link group for new connections */
+	if (!list_empty(&lgr->list))
+		list_del_init(&lgr->list);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&smc_lgr_list.lock);
+}
+
 /* setup for RDMA connection of client */
 static int smc_connect_rdma(struct smc_sock *smc)
 {
@@ -513,6 +522,8 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma(struct smc_sock *smc)
 	return rc ? rc : local_contact;
 
 decline_rdma_unlock:
+	if (local_contact == SMC_FIRST_CONTACT)
+		smc_lgr_forget(smc->conn.lgr);
 	mutex_unlock(&smc_create_lgr_pending);
 	smc_conn_free(&smc->conn);
 decline_rdma:
@@ -526,6 +537,8 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma(struct smc_sock *smc)
 	goto out_connected;
 
 out_err_unlock:
+	if (local_contact == SMC_FIRST_CONTACT)
+		smc_lgr_forget(smc->conn.lgr);
 	mutex_unlock(&smc_create_lgr_pending);
 	smc_conn_free(&smc->conn);
 out_err:
@@ -906,6 +919,8 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	return;
 
 decline_rdma_unlock:
+	if (local_contact == SMC_FIRST_CONTACT)
+		smc_lgr_forget(new_smc->conn.lgr);
 	mutex_unlock(&smc_create_lgr_pending);
 decline_rdma:
 	/* RDMA setup failed, switch back to TCP */
@@ -918,6 +933,8 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	goto out_connected;
 
 out_err_unlock:
+	if (local_contact == SMC_FIRST_CONTACT)
+		smc_lgr_forget(new_smc->conn.lgr);
 	mutex_unlock(&smc_create_lgr_pending);
 out_err:
 	newsmcsk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED;
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index 94f21116dac5..7406cbb41856 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ static void smc_lgr_free_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	bool conns;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&smc_lgr_list.lock);
+	if (list_empty(&lgr->list))
+		goto free;
 	read_lock_bh(&lgr->conns_lock);
 	conns = RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&lgr->conns_all);
 	read_unlock_bh(&lgr->conns_lock);
@@ -136,6 +138,7 @@ static void smc_lgr_free_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		return;
 	}
 	list_del_init(&lgr->list); /* remove from smc_lgr_list */
+free:
 	spin_unlock_bh(&smc_lgr_list.lock);
 	smc_lgr_free(lgr);
 }
-- 
2.13.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-25 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-25 10:15 [PATCH net-next 0/6] net/smc: more socket closing improvements Ursula Braun
2018-01-25 10:15 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] net/smc: cancel tx worker in case of socket aborts Ursula Braun
2018-01-25 10:15 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] net/smc: handle state SMC_PEERFINCLOSEWAIT correctly Ursula Braun
2018-01-25 10:15 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] net/smc: terminate link group for ib_post_send problems Ursula Braun
2018-01-25 10:15 ` Ursula Braun [this message]
2018-01-25 10:15 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] net/smc: wake up wr_reg_wait when terminating a link group Ursula Braun
2018-01-25 10:15 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] net/smc: check for healthy link group resp. connections Ursula Braun
2018-01-25 21:11 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] net/smc: more socket closing improvements David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180125101536.15727-5-ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raspl@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox