From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 11:40:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180205104030.643-1-david@redhat.com> (raw)
Missed when enabling the Multiple-epoch facility. If the facility is
installed and the control is set, a sign based comaprison has to be
performed.
Right now we would inject wrong interrupts and ignore interrupt
conditions. Also the sleep time is calculated in a wrong way.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
We might be able to drop the checks for "test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 139)",
as the architecture states:
"When the multiple-epoch facility is not installed in the configuration
and the clock-comparator sign control is one, it is unpredictable whether
the comparison follows the rules of unsigned or signed binary arithmetic."
Have no machine to test this with :(
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index 024ad8bcc516..6566a853c0b8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -170,7 +170,16 @@ static int ckc_interrupts_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static int ckc_irq_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc >= kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm))
+ int64_t ckc, tod;
+
+ if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul &&
+ test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 139)) {
+ ckc = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc;
+ tod = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm);
+ if (ckc >= tod)
+ return 0;
+ } else if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc >=
+ kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm))
return 0;
return ckc_interrupts_enabled(vcpu);
}
@@ -1011,13 +1020,24 @@ int kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static u64 __calculate_sltime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- u64 now, cputm, sltime = 0;
+ u64 now, cputm, ckc, sltime = 0;
+ int64_t ckc_signed, now_signed;
if (ckc_interrupts_enabled(vcpu)) {
- now = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm);
- sltime = tod_to_ns(vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc - now);
- /* already expired or overflow? */
- if (!sltime || vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc <= now)
+ if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul &&
+ test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 139)) {
+ now = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm);
+ ckc = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc;
+ if (ckc < now)
+ sltime = tod_to_ns(now - ckc);
+ } else {
+ now_signed = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm);
+ ckc_signed = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc;
+ if (ckc_signed < now_signed)
+ sltime = tod_to_ns(now_signed - ckc_signed);
+ }
+ /* already expired */
+ if (!sltime)
return 0;
if (cpu_timer_interrupts_enabled(vcpu)) {
cputm = kvm_s390_get_cpu_timer(vcpu);
--
2.14.3
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-05 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-05 10:40 David Hildenbrand [this message]
2018-02-05 12:46 ` [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-05 13:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-05 13:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-02-06 16:34 ` Collin L. Walling
2018-02-06 17:02 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180205104030.643-1-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox