From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: y2038@lists.linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] s390: hypfs: use ktime_get_seconds() instead of get_seconds()
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:05:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180618100534.1857997-1-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
time_t and get_seconds() are deprecated because they will overflow on
32-bit architectures in the future. This is not a problem on 64-bit s390,
but we should use proper interfaces anyway.
Besides moving to the time64_t based interface, the CLOCK_MONOTONIC
based ktime_get_seconds() is preferred for kernel internal timekeeping
because it does not behave in unexpected ways during leap second changes
or settimeofday() calls.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c b/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c
index 06b513d192b9..c681329fdeec 100644
--- a/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c
+++ b/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct hypfs_sb_info {
kuid_t uid; /* uid used for files and dirs */
kgid_t gid; /* gid used for files and dirs */
struct dentry *update_file; /* file to trigger update */
- time_t last_update; /* last update time in secs since 1970 */
+ time64_t last_update; /* last update, CLOCK_MONOTONIC time */
struct mutex lock; /* lock to protect update process */
};
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static void hypfs_update_update(struct super_block *sb)
struct hypfs_sb_info *sb_info = sb->s_fs_info;
struct inode *inode = d_inode(sb_info->update_file);
- sb_info->last_update = get_seconds();
+ sb_info->last_update = ktime_get_seconds();
inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
}
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static ssize_t hypfs_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
* to restart data collection in this case.
*/
mutex_lock(&fs_info->lock);
- if (fs_info->last_update == get_seconds()) {
+ if (fs_info->last_update == ktime_get_seconds()) {
rc = -EBUSY;
goto out;
}
--
2.9.0
next reply other threads:[~2018-06-18 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-18 10:05 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2018-06-18 11:26 ` [PATCH] s390: hypfs: use ktime_get_seconds() instead of get_seconds() Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180618100534.1857997-1-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=y2038@lists.linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox