From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] KVM: s390: vsie: simulate VCPU SIE entry/exit
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 14:44:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180808144414.75369a40.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180807125131.3606-2-david@redhat.com>
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:51:30 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> VCPU requests and VCPU blocking right now don't take care of the vSIE
> (as it was not necessary until now). But we want to have VCPU requests
> that will also be handled before running the vSIE again.
>
> So let's simulate a SIE entry when entering the vSIE loop and check
> for PROG_ flags. The existing infrastructure (e.g. exit_sie()) will then
> detect that the SIE (in form of the vSIE execution loop) is running and
> properly kick the vSIE CPU, resulting in it leaving the vSIE loop and
> therefore the vSIE interception handler, allowing it to handle VCPU
> requests.
>
> E.g. if we want to modify the crycb of the VCPU and make sure that any
> masks also get applied to the VSIE crycb shadow (which uses masks from the
> VCPU crycb), we will need a way to hinder the vSIE from running and make
> sure to process the updated crycb before reentering the vSIE again.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 9 ++++++++-
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 1 +
> arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-08 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-07 12:51 [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: vsie: support VCPU requests David Hildenbrand
2018-08-07 12:51 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] KVM: s390: vsie: simulate VCPU SIE entry/exit David Hildenbrand
2018-08-07 17:06 ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-08 12:44 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-08-09 5:38 ` Janosch Frank
2018-08-09 7:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-07 12:51 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: s390: introduce and use KVM_REQ_VSIE_RESTART David Hildenbrand
2018-08-07 17:06 ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-08 12:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-08-08 12:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-09 5:39 ` Janosch Frank
2018-08-07 17:15 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: vsie: support VCPU requests Pierre Morel
2018-08-07 17:35 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180808144414.75369a40.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox