public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, lokeshgidra@google.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	elfring@users.sourceforge.net, Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, dancol@google.com,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>,
	hughd@google.com, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: speed up mremap by 500x on large regions
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:50:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181012125046.GA170912@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181012113056.gxhcbrqyu7k7xnyv@kshutemo-mobl1>

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:30:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 06:37:56PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
> > related operations. The mremap system call can be really slow if THP is
> > not enabled. The bottleneck is move_page_tables, which is copying each
> > pte at a time, and can be really slow across a large map. Turning on THP
> > may not be a viable option, and is not for us. This patch speeds up the
> > performance for non-THP system by copying at the PMD level when possible.
> > 
> > The speed up is three orders of magnitude. On a 1GB mremap, the mremap
> > completion times drops from 160-250 millesconds to 380-400 microseconds.
> > 
> > Before:
> > Total mremap time for 1GB data: 242321014 nanoseconds.
> > Total mremap time for 1GB data: 196842467 nanoseconds.
> > Total mremap time for 1GB data: 167051162 nanoseconds.
> > 
> > After:
> > Total mremap time for 1GB data: 385781 nanoseconds.
> > Total mremap time for 1GB data: 388959 nanoseconds.
> > Total mremap time for 1GB data: 402813 nanoseconds.
> > 
> > Incase THP is enabled, the optimization is skipped. I also flush the
> > tlb every time we do this optimization since I couldn't find a way to
> > determine if the low-level PTEs are dirty. It is seen that the cost of
> > doing so is not much compared the improvement, on both x86-64 and arm64.
> 
> I looked into the code more and noticed move_pte() helper called from
> move_ptes(). It changes PTE entry to suite new address.
> 
> It is only defined in non-trivial way on Sparc. I don't know much about
> Sparc and it's hard for me to say if the optimization will break anything
> there.

Sparc's move_pte seems to be flushing the D-cache to prevent aliasing. It is
not modifying the PTE itself AFAICS:

#ifdef DCACHE_ALIASING_POSSIBLE
#define __HAVE_ARCH_MOVE_PTE
#define move_pte(pte, prot, old_addr, new_addr)                         \
({                                                                      \
        pte_t newpte = (pte);                                           \
        if (tlb_type != hypervisor && pte_present(pte)) {               \
                unsigned long this_pfn = pte_pfn(pte);                  \
                                                                        \
                if (pfn_valid(this_pfn) &&                              \
                    (((old_addr) ^ (new_addr)) & (1 << 13)))            \
                        flush_dcache_page_all(current->mm,              \
                                              pfn_to_page(this_pfn));   \
        }                                                               \
        newpte;                                                         \
})
#endif

If its an issue, then how do transparent huge pages work on Sparc?  I don't
see the huge page code (move_huge_pages) during mremap doing anything special
for Sparc architecture when moving PMDs..

Also, do we not flush the caches from any path when we munmap address space?
We do call do_munmap on the old mapping from mremap after moving to the new one.

thanks,

 - Joel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-12 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-12  1:37 [PATCH v2 1/2] treewide: remove unused address argument from pte_alloc functions Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-12  1:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: speed up mremap by 500x on large regions Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-12 11:30   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-12 11:36     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-12 12:50     ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2018-10-12 13:19       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-12 16:57         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-12 21:33           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-12 14:09   ` Anton Ivanov
2018-10-12 14:37     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-12 14:48       ` Anton Ivanov
2018-10-12 16:42         ` Anton Ivanov
2018-10-12 16:50           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-12 16:58             ` Anton Ivanov
2018-10-12 17:06               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-12 21:40           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-13  6:10             ` Anton Ivanov
2018-10-15  7:10   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-10-15  8:18     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-10-16  2:08       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-12 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] treewide: remove unused address argument from pte_alloc functions Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-12 16:37   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-12 13:56 ` Anton Ivanov
2018-10-12 16:34   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-12 16:38     ` Julia Lawall
2018-10-12 16:46       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-12 18:51 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-10-12 19:42   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-13  9:22     ` SF Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181012125046.GA170912@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=dancol@google.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=lokeshgidra@google.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox