From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: [PULL 9/9] vfio-ccw: Prevent quiesce function going into an infinite loop
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:15:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425091559.15490-10-cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190425091559.15490-1-cohuck@redhat.com>
From: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
The quiesce function calls cio_cancel_halt_clear() and if we
get an -EBUSY we go into a loop where we:
- wait for any interrupts
- flush all I/O in the workqueue
- retry cio_cancel_halt_clear
During the period where we are waiting for interrupts or
flushing all I/O, the channel subsystem could have completed
a halt/clear action and turned off the corresponding activity
control bits in the subchannel status word. This means the next
time we call cio_cancel_halt_clear(), we will again start by
calling cancel subchannel and so we can be stuck between calling
cancel and halt forever.
Rather than calling cio_cancel_halt_clear() immediately after
waiting, let's try to disable the subchannel. If we succeed in
disabling the subchannel then we know nothing else can happen
with the device.
Suggested-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <4d5a4b98ab1b41ac6131b5c36de18b76c5d66898.1555449329.git.alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
index d72aa8c760c5..ee8767f5845a 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
@@ -43,26 +43,30 @@ int vfio_ccw_sch_quiesce(struct subchannel *sch)
if (ret != -EBUSY)
goto out_unlock;
+ iretry = 255;
do {
- iretry = 255;
ret = cio_cancel_halt_clear(sch, &iretry);
- while (ret == -EBUSY) {
- /*
- * Flush all I/O and wait for
- * cancel/halt/clear completion.
- */
- private->completion = &completion;
- spin_unlock_irq(sch->lock);
- wait_for_completion_timeout(&completion, 3*HZ);
+ if (ret == -EIO) {
+ pr_err("vfio_ccw: could not quiesce subchannel 0.%x.%04x!\n",
+ sch->schid.ssid, sch->schid.sch_no);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Flush all I/O and wait for
+ * cancel/halt/clear completion.
+ */
+ private->completion = &completion;
+ spin_unlock_irq(sch->lock);
- private->completion = NULL;
- flush_workqueue(vfio_ccw_work_q);
- spin_lock_irq(sch->lock);
- ret = cio_cancel_halt_clear(sch, &iretry);
- };
+ if (ret == -EBUSY)
+ wait_for_completion_timeout(&completion, 3*HZ);
+ private->completion = NULL;
+ flush_workqueue(vfio_ccw_work_q);
+ spin_lock_irq(sch->lock);
ret = cio_disable_subchannel(sch);
} while (ret == -EBUSY);
out_unlock:
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-25 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-25 9:15 [PULL 0/9] vfio-ccw patches for 5.2 Cornelia Huck
2019-04-25 9:15 ` [PULL 1/9] vfio-ccw: make it safe to access channel programs Cornelia Huck
2019-04-25 9:15 ` [PULL 2/9] vfio-ccw: rework ssch state handling Cornelia Huck
2019-04-25 9:15 ` [PULL 3/9] vfio-ccw: protect the I/O region Cornelia Huck
2019-04-25 9:15 ` [PULL 4/9] vfio-ccw: add capabilities chain Cornelia Huck
2019-04-25 9:15 ` [PULL 5/9] s390/cio: export hsch to modules Cornelia Huck
2019-04-25 9:15 ` [PULL 6/9] vfio-ccw: add handling for async channel instructions Cornelia Huck
2019-04-25 9:15 ` [PULL 7/9] vfio-ccw: Do not call flush_workqueue while holding the spinlock Cornelia Huck
2019-04-25 9:15 ` [PULL 8/9] vfio-ccw: Release any channel program when releasing/removing vfio-ccw mdev Cornelia Huck
2019-04-25 9:15 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-04-25 11:47 ` [PULL 0/9] vfio-ccw patches for 5.2 Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190425091559.15490-10-cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox