From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] s390/cio: Remove vfio-ccw checks of command codes
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:06:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190508120648.6c40231d.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c2b74a9-e1d9-cd63-1284-6544fa4376d9@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, 8 May 2019 11:22:07 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> The TEST command is used to retrieve the status of the I/O-device
> __path__ and do not go up to the device.
> I did not find clearly that it does not start a data transfer but I
> really do not think it does.
> May be we should ask people from hardware.
> I only found that test I/O (a specific test command) do not initiate an
> operation.
FWIW, I'm not sure about what we should do with the test command in any
case.
Currently, I see it defined as a proper command in the rather ancient
"Common I/O Device Commands" (I don't know of any newer public
version), which states that it retrieves the status on the parallel
interface _only_ (and generates a command reject on the serial
interface). IIRC, the parallel interface has been phased out quite some
time ago.
The current PoP, in contrast, defines this as an _invalid_ command
(generating a channel program check).
So, while the test command originally was designed to never initiate a
data transfer, we now have an invalid command in its place, and we
don't know if something else might change in the future (for transfer
mode, a test-like command is already defined in the PoP).
So, the safest course would probably be to handle the ->cda portion and
send the command down. We'll get a check condition on current hardware,
but it should be safe if something changes in the future.
Of course, asking some hardware folks is not a bad idea, either :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-08 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-03 13:49 [PATCH v1 0/7] s390: vfio-ccw fixes Eric Farman
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 1/7] s390/cio: Update SCSW if it points to the end of the chain Eric Farman
2019-05-06 14:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-06 15:23 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/7] s390/cio: Set vfio-ccw FSM state before ioeventfd Eric Farman
2019-05-06 14:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-06 16:36 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-07 8:32 ` Pierre Morel
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 3/7] s390/cio: Split pfn_array_alloc_pin into pieces Eric Farman
2019-05-08 10:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-08 13:25 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-08 13:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 4/7] s390/cio: Initialize the host addresses in pfn_array Eric Farman
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 5/7] s390/cio: Allow zero-length CCWs in vfio-ccw Eric Farman
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 6/7] s390/cio: Don't pin vfio pages for empty transfers Eric Farman
2019-05-06 15:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-06 15:40 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 7/7] s390/cio: Remove vfio-ccw checks of command codes Eric Farman
2019-05-06 12:56 ` Pierre Morel
2019-05-06 15:39 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-06 20:47 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-07 8:52 ` Pierre Morel
2019-05-07 16:43 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-08 9:22 ` Pierre Morel
2019-05-08 10:06 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-05-08 19:38 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-10 11:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-10 14:24 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-14 14:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-14 18:29 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-06 15:37 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-06 15:46 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-06 16:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-06 16:25 ` Eric Farman
2019-05-06 16:31 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190508120648.6c40231d.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox