From: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
jannh@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, arnd@arndb.de,
shuah@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, tkjos@android.com,
ldv@altlinux.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range()
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 13:51:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523115118.pmscbd6kaqy37dym@brauner.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522165737.GC4915@redhat.com>
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 06:57:37PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 05/22, Christian Brauner wrote:
> >
> > +static struct file *pick_file(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
> > {
> > - struct file *file;
> > + struct file *file = NULL;
> > struct fdtable *fdt;
> >
> > spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> > @@ -632,15 +629,65 @@ int __close_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd)
> > goto out_unlock;
> > rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
> > __put_unused_fd(files, fd);
> > - spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> > - return filp_close(file, files);
> >
> > out_unlock:
> > spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> > - return -EBADF;
> > + return file;
>
> ...
>
> > +int __close_range(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd, unsigned max_fd)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int cur_max;
> > +
> > + if (fd > max_fd)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + cur_max = files_fdtable(files)->max_fds;
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > + /* cap to last valid index into fdtable */
> > + if (max_fd >= cur_max)
> > + max_fd = cur_max - 1;
> > +
> > + while (fd <= max_fd) {
> > + struct file *file;
> > +
> > + file = pick_file(files, fd++);
>
> Well, how about something like
>
> static unsigned int find_next_opened_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned start)
> {
> unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds;
> unsigned int maxbit = maxfd / BITS_PER_LONG;
> unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;
>
> bitbit = find_next_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
> if (bitbit > maxfd)
> return maxfd;
> if (bitbit > start)
> start = bitbit;
> return find_next_bit(fdt->open_fds, maxfd, start);
> }
>
> unsigned close_next_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned start, unsigned maxfd)
> {
> unsigned fd;
> struct file *file;
> struct fdtable *fdt;
>
> spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> fdt = files_fdtable(files);
> fd = find_next_opened_fd(fdt, start);
> if (fd >= fdt->max_fds || fd > maxfd) {
> fd = -1;
> goto out;
> }
>
> file = fdt->fd[fd];
> rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
> __put_unused_fd(files, fd);
> out:
> spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
>
> if (fd == -1u)
> return fd;
>
> filp_close(file, files);
> return fd + 1;
> }
Thanks, Oleg!
I kept it dumb and was about to reply that your solution introduces more
code when it seemed we wanted to keep this very simple for now.
But then I saw that find_next_opened_fd() already exists as
find_next_fd(). So it's actually not bad compared to what I sent in v1.
So - with some small tweaks (need to test it and all now) - how do we
feel about?:
/**
* __close_next_open_fd() - Close the nearest open fd.
*
* @curfd: lowest file descriptor to consider
* @maxfd: highest file descriptor to consider
*
* This function will close the nearest open fd, i.e. it will either
* close @curfd if it is open or the closest open file descriptor
* c greater than @curfd that
* is smaller or equal to maxfd.
* If the function found a file descriptor to close it will return 0 and
* place the file descriptor it closed in @curfd. If it did not find a
* file descriptor to close it will return -EBADF.
*/
static int __close_next_open_fd(struct files_struct *files, unsigned *curfd, unsigned maxfd)
{
struct file *file = NULL;
unsigned fd;
struct fdtable *fdt;
spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
fdt = files_fdtable(files);
fd = find_next_fd(fdt, *curfd);
if (fd >= fdt->max_fds || fd > maxfd)
goto out_unlock;
file = fdt->fd[fd];
rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
out_unlock:
spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
if (!file)
return -EBADF;
*curfd = fd;
filp_close(file, files);
return 0;
}
int __close_range(struct files_struct *files, unsigned fd, unsigned max_fd)
{
if (fd > max_fd)
return -EINVAL;
while (fd <= max_fd) {
if (__close_next_fd(files, &fd, maxfd))
break;
cond_resched();
fd++;
}
return 0;
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(close_range, unsigned int, fd, unsigned int, max_fd,
unsigned int, flags)
{
if (flags)
return -EINVAL;
return __close_range(current->files, fd, max_fd);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-23 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-22 15:52 [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range() Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 15:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] tests: add close_range() tests Christian Brauner
2019-05-22 16:57 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] open: add close_range() Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 11:51 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2019-05-23 14:14 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 14:28 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-23 16:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:22 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2019-05-23 16:33 ` Christian Brauner
2019-05-24 10:31 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190523115118.pmscbd6kaqy37dym@brauner.io \
--to=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox