From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 02/10] vfio-ccw: Register a chp_event callback for vfio-ccw
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:48:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191119134809.75ba276b.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191115025620.19593-3-farman@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 03:56:12 +0100
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Register the chp_event callback to receive channel path related
> events for the subchannels managed by vfio-ccw.
>
> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v0->v1: [EF]
> - Add s390dbf trace
>
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> index 91989269faf1..05da1facee60 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/isc.h>
>
> +#include "chp.h"
> #include "ioasm.h"
> #include "css.h"
> #include "vfio_ccw_private.h"
> @@ -257,6 +258,48 @@ static int vfio_ccw_sch_event(struct subchannel *sch, int process)
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static int vfio_ccw_chp_event(struct subchannel *sch,
> + struct chp_link *link, int event)
> +{
> + struct vfio_ccw_private *private = dev_get_drvdata(&sch->dev);
> + int mask = chp_ssd_get_mask(&sch->ssd_info, link);
> + int retry = 255;
> +
> + if (!private || !mask)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (cio_update_schib(sch))
> + return -ENODEV;
It seems this return code is only checked by the common I/O layer for
the _OFFLINE case; still, it's probably not a bad idea, even though it
is different from what the vanilla I/O subchannel driver does.
> +
> + VFIO_CCW_MSG_EVENT(2, "%pUl (%x.%x.%04x): mask=0x%x event=%d\n",
> + mdev_uuid(private->mdev), sch->schid.cssid,
> + sch->schid.ssid, sch->schid.sch_no,
> + mask, event);
If you log only here, you're missing the case above.
> +
> + switch (event) {
> + case CHP_VARY_OFF:
> + /* Path logically turned off */
> + sch->opm &= ~mask;
> + sch->lpm &= ~mask;
> + break;
> + case CHP_OFFLINE:
> + /* Path is gone */
> + cio_cancel_halt_clear(sch, &retry);
> + break;
> + case CHP_VARY_ON:
> + /* Path logically turned on */
> + sch->opm |= mask;
> + sch->lpm |= mask;
> + break;
> + case CHP_ONLINE:
> + /* Path became available */
> + sch->lpm |= mask & sch->opm;
> + break;
> + }
Looks sane as the first round.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct css_device_id vfio_ccw_sch_ids[] = {
> { .match_flags = 0x1, .type = SUBCHANNEL_TYPE_IO, },
> { /* end of list */ },
> @@ -274,6 +317,7 @@ static struct css_driver vfio_ccw_sch_driver = {
> .remove = vfio_ccw_sch_remove,
> .shutdown = vfio_ccw_sch_shutdown,
> .sch_event = vfio_ccw_sch_event,
> + .chp_event = vfio_ccw_chp_event,
> };
>
> static int __init vfio_ccw_debug_init(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-15 2:56 [RFC PATCH v1 00/10] s390/vfio-ccw: Channel Path Handling Eric Farman
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/10] vfio-ccw: Introduce new helper functions to free/destroy regions Eric Farman
2019-11-19 12:33 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/10] vfio-ccw: Register a chp_event callback for vfio-ccw Eric Farman
2019-11-19 12:48 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-11-19 15:45 ` Eric Farman
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/10] vfio-ccw: Use subchannel lpm in the orb Eric Farman
2019-11-19 13:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-19 15:16 ` Eric Farman
2019-11-19 15:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-19 18:58 ` Eric Farman
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/10] vfio-ccw: Refactor the unregister of the async regions Eric Farman
2019-11-19 16:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/10] vfio-ccw: Introduce a new schib region Eric Farman
2019-11-19 16:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-20 16:49 ` Eric Farman
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/10] vfio-ccw: Introduce a new CRW region Eric Farman
2019-11-19 17:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/10] vfio-ccw: Refactor IRQ handlers Eric Farman
2019-11-19 17:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/10] vfio-ccw: Wire up the CRW irq and CRW region Eric Farman
2019-11-19 18:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-05 20:43 ` Eric Farman
2019-12-06 10:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06 21:24 ` Eric Farman
2019-12-09 12:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/10] vfio-ccw: Add trace for CRW event Eric Farman
2019-11-15 2:56 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/10] vfio-ccw: Remove inline get_schid() routine Eric Farman
2019-11-15 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/10] s390/vfio-ccw: Channel Path Handling Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191119134809.75ba276b.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox